Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: media: Add bindings for qcom,glymur-camss

[Bryan O'Donoghue]

On 01/06/2026 12:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > To be brutally honest, I'd rather see effort and buy-in from qcom engineers
> > in converting to CSIPHY as a distinct sub-node.
> >
> > Pushing patches to hit your own internal deadlines to the detriment of
> > upstream quality is not OK.
> Can we please get an update of the the CSI PHY series? I think they were
> some time ago, they received some comments and there were no updates on them.

There have been three versions in the interregnum v6, v7 and v8 with 
Sashiko responses only, no carbon based lifeforms replied.

I previously agreed to take sm8750 and Kaanapali with legacy bindings 
but those series didn't apply to -next and so will miss this cycle.

I'd like therefore to move _all_ new submissions to CSIPHY as a separate 
node and to stop accepting legacy bindings.

Frankly instead of being pushed to accept legacy stuff by qcom tech 
teams I would rather see them engage with moving to the new way which is 
ultimately beneficial to them and their users.

---
bod