Re: [PATCH 0/3] ata: pata_ep93xx: COMPILE_TEST and ARM fixups

[Rosen Penev]

On Mon, Jun 1, 2026 at 11:34 AM Niklas Cassel <cassel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 11:12:33AM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2026 at 1:54 AM Niklas Cassel <cassel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Rosen,
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 05:36:24PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > > > This small series cleans up pata_ep93xx to allow COMPILE_TEST on
> > > > non-ARM platforms. Patch 1 avoids including ARM-specific asm headers,
> > > > patch 2 switches to unsigned long for the data variable, and patch 3
> > > > enables COMPILE_TEST.
> > > >
> > > > Rosen Penev (3):
> > > >   ata: pata_ep93xx: avoid asm on non ARM
> > > >   ata: pata_ep93xx: use unsigned long for data
> > > >   ata: pata_ep93xx: add COMPILE_TEST support
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/ata/Kconfig       | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/ata/pata_ep93xx.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Your series looks good to me.
> > >
> > > I do not think that you need to address the pre-existing issues reported
> > > by Sashiko.
> > In retrospect, it might make sense to do so such that those fixes get
> > backported to stable kernels.
>
> Oh, don't get me wrong.
>
> If you want to fix up the pre-existing issues, we are happy to accept
> patches :)
Just sent. Hopefully no issues this time.
>
> I just meant that it is not a prerequisite to get this series merged.
One of those patches conflicts with the first here.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Niklas