Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] dma-direct: Add API to preserve/restore allocations
From: Samiullah Khawaja
Date: Tue Jun 02 2026 - 16:14:54 EST
On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 01:35:16PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 12:27:36AM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index ec887f443741..c2b98f91900a 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
*/
#include <linux/memblock.h> /* for max_pfn */
#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/kexec_handover.h>
+#include <linux/kho/abi/dma_alloc.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
@@ -307,6 +309,167 @@ void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
return NULL;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_LIVEUPDATE
+int dma_direct_preserve_allocation(struct device *dev, void *cpu_addr,
+ size_t size, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
+ unsigned long attrs, u64 *state)
+{
+ struct dma_alloc_ser *ser;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!kho_is_enabled())
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_CMA))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Hmm, it seems a bit overkill to do this just because CMA is compiled
in, especially as it's user-selectable in kconfig.
Maybe you need to iterate over the CMA areas using cma_for_each_area(),
similarly to how you do with the pools?
Agreed. So basically return error if the range belongs to one of the
CMAs. I will update this.
Will