[PATCH v2 4/9] mailbox: imx: Use channel index instead of zero in imx_mu_specific_rx()

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

imx_mu_specific_rx() masks channel 0 and unmasks it again at the end of
the function. Given that at startup the channel index got unmasked it
should do the right job.

This here either unmasks the actual channel or another one but should
have no impact given that it reverses its doing at the end.

Use the channel index instead of zero.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
index 1dda1437b87f6..d1de07cc0ed62 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int imx_mu_specific_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *
 
 	data = (u32 *)priv->msg;
 
-	imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv->dcfg->type, 0));
+	imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_RCR, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx));
 	*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR);
 
 	if (priv->dcfg->type & IMX_MU_V2_S4) {
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static int imx_mu_specific_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *
 		*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % num_rr) * 4);
 	}
 
-	imx_mu_xcr_set_act(priv, cp, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv->dcfg->type, 0));
+	imx_mu_xcr_set_act(priv, cp, IMX_MU_RCR, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx));
 	mbox_chan_received_data(cp->chan, (void *)priv->msg);
 
 	return 0;

-- 
2.53.0