Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom: Add CSI2 C-PHY/DPHY schema

[Bryan O'Donoghue]

On 03/06/2026 21:51, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > Actually, one more thing, Why isn't TITAN TOP GDSC here?>>>> +
> If CSIPHYs are true subdevices under the umbrella CAMSS device and well
> described as subnodes, then likely none of power domains are needed to be
> repeatedly described in the children device nodes, since this information
> can be obtained from the parent device by the driver.
>
> Technically 'power-domains' property can be safely removed, I believe.

The policy is to describe the power-domain dependency fully since DT 
describes hardware not software architecture.

Also for a very practical reason a sub-devices can probe/run 
asynchronously of the parent device being active so in fact we do need 
to describe the PDs fully.

---
bod