[PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix multi-line comment style in rtw_mlme.h

[Subhrojyoti Bala]

Block comment was not using * on subsequent lines and had blank
lines inside the comment body. Fix it to comply with kernel
coding style.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Subhrojyoti Bala <subhrojyoti0609@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h | 33 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h
index dbb523c8a58b..59b12d9daa71 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h
@@ -67,23 +67,22 @@ enum {
 };
 
 /*
-
-there are several "locks" in mlme_priv,
-since mlme_priv is a shared resource between many threads,
-like ISR/Call-Back functions, the OID handlers, and even timer functions.
-
-Each struct __queue has its own locks, already.
-Other items in mlme_priv are protected by mlme_priv.lock, while items in
-xmit_priv are protected by xmit_priv.lock.
-
-To avoid possible dead lock, any thread trying to modifying mlme_priv
-SHALL not lock up more than one locks at a time!
-
-The only exception is that queue functions which take the __queue.lock
-may be called with the xmit_priv.lock held. In this case the order
-MUST always be first lock xmit_priv.lock and then call any queue functions
-which take __queue.lock.
-*/
+ * There are several "locks" in mlme_priv,
+ * since mlme_priv is a shared resource between many threads,
+ * like ISR/Call-Back functions, the OID handlers, and even timer functions.
+ *
+ * Each struct __queue has its own locks, already.
+ * Other items in mlme_priv are protected by mlme_priv.lock, while items in
+ * xmit_priv are protected by xmit_priv.lock.
+ *
+ * To avoid possible dead lock, any thread trying to modifying mlme_priv
+ * SHALL not lock up more than one locks at a time!
+ *
+ * The only exception is that queue functions which take the __queue.lock
+ * may be called with the xmit_priv.lock held. In this case the order
+ * MUST always be first lock xmit_priv.lock and then call any queue functions
+ * which take __queue.lock.
+ */
 
 struct sitesurvey_ctrl {
 	u64	last_tx_pkts;
-- 
2.54.0