Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf, sockmap: fix lock inversion between stab->lock and sk_callback_lock
From: Jiayuan Chen
Date: Tue Jun 16 2026 - 06:18:27 EST
On 6/16/26 5:11 PM, Sechang Lim wrote:
sock_map_update_common() and __sock_map_delete() hold stab->lock and call
sock_map_unref() -> sock_map_del_link() under it. sock_map_del_link() takes
sk_callback_lock for write to stop the strparser and verdict, giving the
lock order stab->lock -> sk_callback_lock.
The opposite order comes from an SK_SKB stream parser. On RX,
sk_psock_strp_data_ready() holds sk_callback_lock for read while running
the parser. The verdict redirects the skb to egress, where a sched_cls
The commit message is wrong. A verdict does not redirect to egress
synchronously — sk_psock_skb_redirect() only queues the skb and
schedule_delayed_work()s sk_psock_backlog, so egress runs in workqueue
context, not under sk_callback_lock.
program calls bpf_map_delete_elem() on a sockmap, which takes stab->lock:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
7.1.0-rc6 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.9.8824 is trying to acquire lock:
(&stab->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __sock_map_delete net/core/sock_map.c:421
but task is already holding lock:
(clock-AF_INET){++.-}-{3:3}, at: sk_psock_strp_data_ready net/core/skmsg.c:1173
-> #1 (clock-AF_INET){++.-}-{3:3}:
_raw_write_lock_bh
sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:167
sock_map_unref net/core/sock_map.c:184
sock_map_update_common net/core/sock_map.c:509
sock_map_update_elem_sys net/core/sock_map.c:588
map_update_elem kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1805
-> #0 (&stab->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}:
_raw_spin_lock_bh
__sock_map_delete net/core/sock_map.c:421
sock_map_delete_elem net/core/sock_map.c:452
bpf_prog_06044d24140080b6
tcx_run net/core/dev.c:4451
sch_handle_egress net/core/dev.c:4541
__dev_queue_xmit net/core/dev.c:4808
...
tcp_bpf_strp_read_sock net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c:701
I guess it is an ACK. What is the actual purpose of a sched_cls program calling
sockmap delete on the TX path of an ACK? If there is no real use case for it, this is
just broken BPF usage, not a kernel bug worth this change.