[PATCH sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: check remote rq eligibility under task's rq lock

[Kuba Piecuch]

task_can_run_on_remote_rq() operates under the assumption that
p->migration_disabled is stable, i.e. if the kernel observed
is_migration_disabled(p) == true, then the BPF scheduler must have also
been able to see this when dispatching the task, and it's the BPF
scheduler's fault that it tried to dispatch a task with migration
disabled to a CPU other than the task's current CPU.

This assumption does not always hold. It's possible that the BPF
scheduler saw is_migration_disabled(p) == false, while the kernel
observes is_migration_disabled(p) == true in dispatch_to_local_dsq()
-> task_can_run_on_remote_rq().

The crucial thing here is that with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU, migration is
disabled while a task is executing a BPF program. So, if there's a
situation where the BPF scheduler checks a task while it's not executing
a BPF program, while the kernel checks it while it is executing one,
the BPF scheduler will be killed through no fault of its own.

Consider the following scenario:

1. SCX task @p is executing on CPU A and CPU A gets preempted by a
   higher-priority scheduling class. On entry to __schedule(),
   p->migration_disabled == 0.

2. In put_prev_task_scx() @p is enqueued on the BPF scheduler's internal
   data structures, making it available for other CPUs to dispatch.

3. CPU B enters ops.dispatch(), pops @p from the BPF scheduler's data
   structures, checks is_migration_disabled(p) which returns false,
   and dispatches @p to CPU B's local DSQ.

4. On CPU A, @p hasn't been switched out yet. Execution reaches
   trace_sched_switch() which enters a BPF program, as the BPF scheduler
   hooks into the sched_switch tracepoint to detect idle->fair
   transitions. On entry into the BPF program, @p disables migration.

5. CPU B enters finish_dispatch() -> dispatch_to_local_dsq() ->
   task_can_run_on_remote_rq() which observes
   is_migration_disabled(p) == true, triggering scx_error().
   This all happens while holding CPU B's rq lock, so it's not
   synchronized with @p switching out.

This patch fixes this by moving the call to task_can_run_on_remote_rq()
after @p's rq lock is acquired in dispatch_to_local_dsq(). This way, we
synchronize with @p switching out, since @p holds its rq lock all
the way until it's switched out. Thus, any BPF programs that are called
between put_prev_task_scx() and the end of the context switch are
guaranteed to have finished and cannot influence p->migration_disabled.

Also add a lockdep assertion in task_can_run_on_remote_rq() which
ensures the task rq lock is held if enforce == true.

Signed-off-by: Kuba Piecuch <jpiecuch@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/ext.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 6567f626b3f0..4ae7ca4e0a41 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -2422,6 +2422,7 @@ static void move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,
  *   no to the BPF scheduler initiated migrations while offline.
  *
  * The caller must ensure that @p and @rq are on different CPUs.
+ * If enforce == true, caller must hold @p's rq lock.
  */
 static bool task_can_run_on_remote_rq(struct scx_sched *sch,
 				      struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
@@ -2429,6 +2430,14 @@ static bool task_can_run_on_remote_rq(struct scx_sched *sch,
 {
 	s32 cpu = cpu_of(rq);
 
+	/*
+	 * To prevent races with @p still running on its old CPU while switching
+	 * out, make sure we're holding @p's rq lock so as not to risk
+	 * erroneously killing the BPF scheduler.
+	 */
+	if (enforce)
+		lockdep_assert_rq_held(task_rq(p));
+
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(task_cpu(p) == cpu);
 
 	/*
@@ -2696,13 +2705,6 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (src_rq != dst_rq &&
-	    unlikely(!task_can_run_on_remote_rq(sch, p, dst_rq, true))) {
-		dispatch_enqueue(sch, rq, find_global_dsq(sch, task_cpu(p)), p,
-				 enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS | SCX_ENQ_GDSQ_FALLBACK);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * @p is on a possibly remote @src_rq which we need to lock to move the
 	 * task. If dequeue is in progress, it'd be locking @src_rq and waiting
@@ -2729,6 +2731,7 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
 	/* task_rq couldn't have changed if we're still the holding cpu */
 	if (likely(p->scx.holding_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) &&
 	    !WARN_ON_ONCE(src_rq != task_rq(p))) {
+		bool fallback = false;
 		/*
 		 * If @p is staying on the same rq, there's no need to go
 		 * through the full deactivate/activate cycle. Optimize by
@@ -2738,6 +2741,11 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
 			p->scx.holding_cpu = -1;
 			dispatch_enqueue(sch, dst_rq, &dst_rq->scx.local_dsq, p,
 					 enq_flags);
+		} else if (unlikely(!task_can_run_on_remote_rq(sch, p, dst_rq, true))) {
+			p->scx.holding_cpu = -1;
+			fallback = true;
+			dispatch_enqueue(sch, src_rq, find_global_dsq(sch, task_cpu(p)),
+					 p, enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_GDSQ_FALLBACK);
 		} else {
 			move_remote_task_to_local_dsq(p, enq_flags,
 						      src_rq, dst_rq);
@@ -2746,7 +2754,7 @@ static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
 		}
 
 		/* if the destination CPU is idle, wake it up */
-		if (sched_class_above(p->sched_class, dst_rq->curr->sched_class))
+		if (!fallback && sched_class_above(p->sched_class, dst_rq->curr->sched_class))
 			resched_curr(dst_rq);
 	}
 
-- 
2.55.0.rc0.786.g65d90a0328-goog