Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: arm64: Implement lazy vCPU state sync for non-protected guests
From: Vincent Donnefort
Date: Fri Jun 19 2026 - 09:13:12 EST
On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 08:07:19AM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> pKVM copies a non-protected guest's register context between the host
> and the hypervisor on every world switch, even when the host never
> inspects it. Defer the copy: on entry, flush the host context into the
> hyp vCPU only when the host marked it dirty (PKVM_HOST_STATE_DIRTY); on
> exit, leave it in the hyp vCPU and copy it back only when the host needs
> it, via a __pkvm_vcpu_sync_state hypercall on trap handling or at vcpu
> put. A protected guest's context is copied as before, since lazy sync
> only helps where the host is trusted to see the guest's registers.
>
> PC and PSTATE are the exception: they are copied back on every exit so
> the kvm_exit tracepoint reports the guest's real exit PC, and the run
> loop's vcpu_mode_is_bad_32bit() and SError-masking checks evaluate the
> guest's current PSTATE rather than the value left by the previous sync.
>
> handle_exit_early() can also inject an SError, which writes the guest
> context (ESR_EL1) outside the trap-handling path. For a non-protected
> guest it therefore syncs the context from the hyp vCPU and marks it
> dirty, as handle_trap_exceptions() does, so the injection reaches the
> hyp vCPU on re-entry rather than being dropped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 7 +++
> arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 30 +++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 5 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> index 043495f7fc78..6e1135b3ded4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ enum __kvm_host_smccc_func {
> __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_finalize_teardown_vm,
> __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_vcpu_load,
> __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_vcpu_put,
> + __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_vcpu_sync_state,
> __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_tlb_flush_vmid,
>
> MARKER(__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC_MAX)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 2faa60df847d..caa39ee5125f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1068,6 +1068,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> #define INCREMENT_PC __vcpu_single_flag(iflags, BIT(1))
> /* Target EL/MODE (not a single flag, but let's abuse the macro) */
> #define EXCEPT_MASK __vcpu_single_flag(iflags, GENMASK(3, 1))
> +/* Host-set: the hyp flushes the non-protected vCPU state in on entry */
> +#define PKVM_HOST_STATE_DIRTY __vcpu_single_flag(iflags, BIT(4))
>
> /* Helpers to encode exceptions with minimum fuss */
> #define __EXCEPT_MASK_VAL unpack_vcpu_flag(EXCEPT_MASK)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 3732ee9eb0d4..4e89558d8027 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -733,6 +733,10 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (is_protected_kvm_enabled()) {
> kvm_call_hyp(__vgic_v3_save_aprs, &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3);
> kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_vcpu_put);
> +
> + /* __pkvm_vcpu_put implies a sync of the state */
> + if (!kvm_vm_is_protected(vcpu->kvm))
> + vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, PKVM_HOST_STATE_DIRTY);
> }
>
> kvm_vcpu_put_debug(vcpu);
> @@ -964,6 +968,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return ret;
>
> if (is_protected_kvm_enabled()) {
> + /* Start with the vcpu in a dirty state */
> + if (!kvm_vm_is_protected(vcpu->kvm))
> + vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, PKVM_HOST_STATE_DIRTY);
> ret = pkvm_create_hyp_vm(kvm);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 54aedf93c78b..8963621bcdd1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -422,6 +422,20 @@ static int handle_trap_exceptions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> int handled;
>
> + /*
> + * If we run a non-protected VM when protection is enabled
> + * system-wide, resync the state from the hypervisor and mark
> + * it as dirty on the host side if it wasn't dirty already
> + * (which could happen if preemption has taken place).
> + */
> + if (is_protected_kvm_enabled() && !kvm_vm_is_protected(vcpu->kvm)) {
> + guard(preempt)();
> + if (!(vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, PKVM_HOST_STATE_DIRTY))) {
> + kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_vcpu_sync_state);
> + vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, PKVM_HOST_STATE_DIRTY);
> + }
> + }
> +
Could we remove this update here and let handle_exit_early() do the sync
regardless of the SError injection? One of the main point of handle_exit_early()
is to do things under !prempt().
> /*
> * See ARM ARM B1.14.1: "Hyp traps on instructions
> * that fail their condition code check"
> @@ -489,6 +503,22 @@ int handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int exception_index)
> /* For exit types that need handling before we can be preempted */
> void handle_exit_early(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int exception_index)
> {
> + bool inject_serror = ARM_SERROR_PENDING(exception_index) ||
> + ARM_EXCEPTION_CODE(exception_index) == ARM_EXCEPTION_EL1_SERROR;
> +
> + /*
> + * An SError injected below writes the host ctxt; for a non-protected
> + * guest, sync from the hyp vCPU and keep it dirty so it isn't dropped.
> + */
> + if (is_protected_kvm_enabled()) {
Should we test !kvm_vm_is_protected(vcpu->kvm) here, as the
PKVM_HOST_STATE_DIRTY is only updated for p-guests everywhere else?
> + vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, PKVM_HOST_STATE_DIRTY);
> +
> + if (inject_serror && !kvm_vm_is_protected(vcpu->kvm)) {
> + kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_vcpu_sync_state);
> + vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, PKVM_HOST_STATE_DIRTY);
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (ARM_SERROR_PENDING(exception_index)) {
> if (this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN)) {
> u64 disr = kvm_vcpu_get_disr(vcpu);
[...]