Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] powerpc: A few misc cpumask changes

[Madhavan Srinivasan]

On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:17:11 +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> These are some miscellaneous code refactors around using cpumask
> APIs. They are mainly aimed at code simplification.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Dropped the changes done in xive_find_target_in_mask. Those changes are
>   done by Yury Norov already.
> - Collected the tags. Thanks to Yury Norov.
> - Added new patch to use cpumask_intersects instead of using
>   temp_mask to achieve the same goal.
> - Added new patch to print the warning when target CPU not found
>   as discussed in [2]. This patch is kept separate since this adds
>   a new warning in case of failure. So one may perceive it as functional
>   change.
> 
> [...]

Applied to powerpc/next.

[1/4] powerpc: Use cpumask_next_wrap instead
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1ca0c82bbc72e8e3de0a41e6dbf92473c00f3d1e
[2/4] powerpc: Simplify cpumask api usage for cpuinfo display
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/a66eab7a5d7decadad51b4204c6f2f0d8cf665d1
[3/4] powerpc/perf: Use cpumask_intersects api for checking disable path
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1f8986fdae91880411a3be907879ba63973da100
[4/4] powerpc/xive: Add warning if target CPU not found
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/0521dbbc5710aca3b3d189747781761732289623

cheers