Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: chipcap2: Add label property

[Javier Carrasco]

On Mon Jun 22, 2026 at 2:21 PM CEST, Flaviu Nistor wrote:
> Add support for an optional label property similar to other hwmon devices.
> This allows, in case of boards with multiple CHIPCAP2 sensors, to assign
> distinct names to each instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Flaviu Nistor <flaviu.nistor@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/amphenol,chipcap2.yaml         | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/amphenol,chipcap2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/amphenol,chipcap2.yaml
> index 17351fdbefce..f00b5a4b14dd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/amphenol,chipcap2.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/amphenol,chipcap2.yaml
> @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ properties:
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
>
> +  label:
> +    description:
> +      A descriptive name for this channel, like "ambient" or "psu".
> +
>    interrupts:
>      items:
>        - description: measurement ready indicator
> @@ -72,6 +76,7 @@ examples:
>                           <5 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>                           <6 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>              interrupt-names = "ready", "low", "high";
> +            label = "somelabel";
>              vdd-supply = <&reg_vdd>;
>          };
>      };

Hello Falviu, thank you for your patch.

Should we not add a reference to hwmon-common.yaml (with
unevelautedProperties instead of additionalProperties), as label is
defined there? I believe that Krzysztof Kozlowski did something similar
for the shunt-resistor-micro-ohms property. Could we follow suit here?

I am also not a big fan of a name like "somelabel", and a more
meaningful name from a "real" example would look better. I know that
some examples have already used "somelabel" as an example, but others
have used more meaningful names too.

Best regards,
Javier Carrasco