[PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover pseudo-BTF ksym log masking

From: Nuoqi Gui

Date: Tue Jun 23 2026 - 06:44:11 EST


Add verifier_unpriv coverage for a raw socket-filter load of the
bpf_prog_active typed ksym. The test verifies that the unprivileged load
remains accepted and that the verbose verifier log prints the ldimm64
immediate as 0x0 instead of exposing a nonzero kernel address.

Signed-off-by: Nuoqi Gui <gnq25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_unpriv.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_unpriv.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_unpriv.c
index c16f8382cf17..16de1595f015 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_unpriv.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_unpriv.c
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
#include "../../../include/linux/filter.h"
#include "bpf_misc.h"

+extern const int bpf_prog_active __ksym;
+
#define BPF_SK_LOOKUP(func) \
/* struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {} */ \
"r2 = 0;" \
@@ -77,6 +79,23 @@ __naked void dummy_prog_loop1_socket(void)
: __clobber_all);
}

+SEC("socket")
+__description("unpriv: pseudo btf id log masks address")
+__success_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("0: (18) r1 = 0x0")
+__not_msg_unpriv("0: (18) r1 = 0x{{[1-9a-f][0-9a-f]*}}")
+__retval_unpriv(0)
+__log_level(2)
+__naked void pseudo_btf_id_log_masks_address(void)
+{
+ asm volatile ("r1 = %[bpf_prog_active] ll;"
+ "r0 = 0;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_addr(bpf_prog_active)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
SEC("socket")
__description("unpriv: return pointer")
__success __failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("R0 leaks addr")

--
2.34.1