Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] mm/zswap: Implement proactive writeback

[Hao Jia]

On 2026/7/1 00:10, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > > Before going through more versions we need to figure out if this will
> > > pivot to be a proactive demotion interfcae for swap tiering.
> >
> > Yes. Should I drop patches 4-6 in the next version and wait for swap
> > tiering to be finalized?
> > We can try to get the non-memcg parts (patches 1-3) merged upstream
> > first. This would also give them plenty of time to bake and catch any
> > potential regressions. Thoughts?
>
> Patches 1-2 can be sent and merged separately, yes. For patch 2,
> please include some numbers for the writeback performance before and
> after batching.

I'd love to collect some performance data. Do you have any recommended 
benchmarks for this?

Thanks,
Hao
> Patch 3 does refactoring in preparation for patch 4, so I don't think
> it makes sense on its own.