[RFC PATCH] mm: allow smaller large folios to use lru_cache
From: Barry Song (Xiaomi)
Date: Thu Jul 02 2026 - 08:41:41 EST
For a system which primarily uses smaller orders for large folios,
it could be beneficial to enable lru_cache to avoid lock contention.
For large folios with higher orders, the number of folios involved
would be small, so the contention is less significant.
The following small program runs on a system with 16 KiB
mTHP enabled.
#include <pthread.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <string.h>
#define NUM_THREADS 20
#define MEM_SIZE (16 * 1024 * 1024)
#define LOOP_COUNT 1000
void* thread_worker(void* arg) {
void *addr = mmap(NULL, MEM_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
for (int i = 0; i < LOOP_COUNT; i++) {
memset(addr, 0x55, MEM_SIZE);
madvise(addr, MEM_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
}
munmap(addr, MEM_SIZE);
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
int main() {
pthread_t threads[NUM_THREADS];
for (long t = 0; t < NUM_THREADS; t++) {
pthread_create(&threads[t], NULL, thread_worker, (void*)t);
}
for (int t = 0; t < NUM_THREADS; t++) {
pthread_join(threads[t], NULL);
}
return 0;
}
Before patch:
root@barry-desktop:/home/barry# time ./a.out
real 0m20.233s
user 0m21.739s
sys 6m21.143s
Perf lock report:
Name acquired contended avg wait total wait max wait min wait
21158662 21158662 29.20 us 10.30 m 67.83 us 884 ns
13547 13547 14.68 us 198.93 ms 135.39 us 982 ns
rcu_state 41 41 1.83 us 75.21 us 3.46 us 1.27 us
rcu_state 34 34 1.83 us 62.09 us 2.60 us 1.16 us
5 5 21.31 us 106.57 us 25.77 us 18.17 us
5 5 3.01 us 15.07 us 5.19 us 1.53 us
3 3 6.42 us 19.26 us 9.63 us 4.22 us
3 3 4.20 us 12.61 us 7.45 us 2.10 us
2 2 5.03 us 10.06 us 7.88 us 2.18 us
2 2 2.79 us 5.59 us 3.34 us 2.25 us
1 1 4.70 us 4.70 us 4.70 us 4.70 us
1 1 9.77 us 9.77 us 9.77 us 9.77 us
After patch:
root@barry-desktop:/home/barry# time ./a.out
real 0m17.796s
user 0m24.962s
sys 5m28.774s
Perf lock report:
Name acquired contended avg wait total wait max wait min wait
1407013 1407013 25.44 us 35.80 s 127.83 us 972 ns
845113 845113 47.96 us 40.54 s 152.86 us 1.21 us
rcu_state 1920 1920 5.87 us 11.27 ms 25.02 us 1.76 us
rcu_state 1889 1889 5.80 us 10.96 ms 30.35 us 1.61 us
140 140 3.97 us 555.52 us 12.51 us 1.20 us
10 10 61.34 us 613.42 us 96.90 us 44.48 us
8 8 24.03 us 192.26 us 37.64 us 6.95 us
8 8 12.32 us 98.56 us 25.55 us 4.16 us
Both system time and lock contention are noticeably reduced.
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Nico Pache <npache@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Lance Yang <lance.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/swap.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 8f0f68e245ba..fce1d84aa2c8 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -322,9 +322,9 @@ static inline bool folio_may_be_lru_cached(struct folio *folio)
/*
* Holding PMD-sized folios in per-CPU LRU cache unbalances accounting.
* Holding small numbers of low-order mTHP folios in per-CPU LRU cache
- * will be sensible, but nobody has implemented and tested that yet.
+ * will be sensible.
*/
- return !folio_test_large(folio);
+ return folio_order(folio) < PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER;
}
extern atomic_t lru_disable_count;
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)