Re: [PATCH v7] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix command element mask field for BAM v1.6.0+

[Vinod Koul]

On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 11:39:08 +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> BAM version 1.6.0 and later changed the behavior of the mask field in
> command elements for read operations.
> 
> In older BAM versions, or prior implementation assumptions, the mask
> field was effectively ignored for read commands. However, starting from
> BAM v1.6.0, the mask field for read commands is repurposed to carry the
> upper 4 bits of the destination address, enabling support for 36-bit
> addressing. For write commands, the mask field continues to function as
> a traditional write mask.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix command element mask field for BAM v1.6.0+
      commit: 867621ba203027338b525af6729719c544135336

Best regards,
-- 
~Vinod