Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: free the entire IOVA reservation in dma_iova_destroy()
From: Huang, Honglei
Date: Thu Jul 02 2026 - 23:43:22 EST
On 7/2/2026 6:24 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 05:20:33PM +0800, Honglei Huang wrote:
dma_iova_try_alloc() reserves IOVA for the whole requested size and
records it in state->__size, but callers may subsequently link only a
part of that reservation, for example the drm_gpusvm mixed range case,
where a device page range is linked incrementally.
The doc for dma_iova_destroy() is:
"Unlink the IOVA range up to @mapped_len and free the entire IOVA
space."
However __iommu_dma_iova_unlink() computed the amount of IOVA to free
from @mapped_len rather than from the full reservation. When the
reservation is larger than the linked length, the tail
[mapped_len, reserved size] is never returned to the allocator and
is leaked, contrary to the documented contract.
Free the whole reservation using dma_iova_size(), mirroring
dma_iova_free(). The unmap step still operates on @mapped_len only, and
the same iotlb_gather is reused so a single IOTLB flush is performed.
Fixes: 433a76207dcf ("dma-mapping: Implement link/unlink ranges API")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Honglei Huang <honghuan@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
index 9abaec0703e..bb29c82d1c8 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
@@ -2096,8 +2096,11 @@ static void __iommu_dma_iova_unlink(struct device *dev,
if (!iotlb_gather.queued)
iommu_iotlb_sync(domain, &iotlb_gather);
- if (free_iova)
+ if (free_iova) {
+ /* Free the whole reservation, not just the linked @size. */
+ size = iova_align(iovad, dma_iova_size(state) + iova_start_pad);
iommu_dma_free_iova(domain, addr, size, &iotlb_gather);
+ }
Probably the best change will be something like this:
Thanks for the review and for the shown rework, that's much cleaner
than my original approach.
Based on the your code, I have made some modifications to the compilation issues and will send V2.
And the v2 is essentially your diff, I wasn't sure which attribution you'd prefer:
- Suggested-by, what I used in v2
or
- Co-developed-by: + your Signed-off-by.
Just let me know, will adjust in V3.
Regards,
Honglei
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
index 9abaec0703ef..56173e24c8cc 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
@@ -2068,10 +2068,20 @@ static void iommu_dma_iova_unlink_range_slow(struct device *dev,
arch_sync_dma_flush();
}
-static void __iommu_dma_iova_unlink(struct device *dev,
- struct dma_iova_state *state, size_t offset, size_t size,
- enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs,
- bool free_iova)
+/**
+ * dma_iova_unlink - Unlink a range of IOVA space
+ * @dev: DMA device
+ * @state: IOVA state
+ * @offset: offset into the IOVA state to unlink
+ * @size: size of the buffer
+ * @dir: DMA direction
+ * @attrs: attributes of mapping properties
+ *
+ * Unlink a range of IOVA space for the given IOVA state.
+ */
+void dma_iova_unlink(struct device *dev, struct dma_iova_state *state,
+ size_t offset, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
+ unsigned long attrs)
{
struct iommu_domain *domain = iommu_get_dma_domain(dev);
struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie = domain->iova_cookie;
@@ -2096,26 +2106,6 @@ static void __iommu_dma_iova_unlink(struct device *dev,
if (!iotlb_gather.queued)
iommu_iotlb_sync(domain, &iotlb_gather);
- if (free_iova)
- iommu_dma_free_iova(domain, addr, size, &iotlb_gather);
-}
-
-/**
- * dma_iova_unlink - Unlink a range of IOVA space
- * @dev: DMA device
- * @state: IOVA state
- * @offset: offset into the IOVA state to unlink
- * @size: size of the buffer
- * @dir: DMA direction
- * @attrs: attributes of mapping properties
- *
- * Unlink a range of IOVA space for the given IOVA state.
- */
-void dma_iova_unlink(struct device *dev, struct dma_iova_state *state,
- size_t offset, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
- unsigned long attrs)
-{
- __iommu_dma_iova_unlink(dev, state, offset, size, dir, attrs, false);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_iova_unlink);
@@ -2136,14 +2126,13 @@ void dma_iova_destroy(struct device *dev, struct dma_iova_state *state,
unsigned long attrs)
{
if (mapped_len)
- __iommu_dma_iova_unlink(dev, state, 0, mapped_len, dir, attrs,
- true);
- else
- /*
- * We can be here if first call to dma_iova_link() failed and
- * there is nothing to unlink, so let's be more clear.
- */
- dma_iova_free(dev, state);
+ dma_iova_unlink(dev, state, 0, mapped_len, dir, attrs);
+
+ /*
+ * We can be here if first call to dma_iova_link() failed and
+ * there is nothing to unlink, so let's be more clear.
+ */
+ dma_iova_free(dev, state);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_iova_destroy);
}
/**
base-commit: dc59e4fea9d83f03bad6bddf3fa2e52491777482
--
2.34.1