Re: [PATCH v3] mm: page_reporting: allow driver to set batch capacity

From: Michael S. Tsirkin

Date: Sun Jul 05 2026 - 04:26:57 EST


On Sun, Jul 05, 2026 at 01:16:35AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 02:25:13 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > At the moment, if a virtio balloon device has a page reporting vq but
> > its size is < PAGE_REPORTING_CAPACITY (32), the balloon driver fails
> > probe.
> >
> > But, there's no way for host to know this value, so it can easily
> > create a smaller vq and suddenly adding the reporting capability
> > to the device makes all of the driver fail. Not pretty.
> >
> > Add a capacity field to page_reporting_dev_info so drivers can
> > control the maximum number of pages per report batch.
> >
> > In virtio-balloon, set the capacity to the reporting virtqueue size,
> > letting page_reporting adapt to whatever the device provides.
> >
> > Capacity need not be a power of two. Code previously called out
> > division by PAGE_REPORTING_CAPACITY as cheap since it was a power
> > of 2, but no performance difference was observed with non-power-of-2
> > values.
> >
> > If capacity is 0 or exceeds PAGE_REPORTING_CAPACITY, it defaults
> > to PAGE_REPORTING_CAPACITY. The 0 check and the clamping is done in
> > page_reporting_register(), before the reporting work is scheduled,
> > so we never get division by 0.
>
> Thanks. What's the priority here? Should we fix 7.2? Earlier?

If possible, I'd like it in 7.2, have a setup like this (small
queue is useful for perf testing).
It's very early in the cycle and the code seems straight forward...
I judge the chances of breaking anything is tiny because
it just failed probe previously.

> It seems that Sashiko has found a pre-existing issue, a hard-to-hit
> error path thing:
>
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/444c24cf39f3f3620fc90ef4695bd6b0979f4c4b.1783232420.git.mst@xxxxxxxxxx
>

will look into this, thanks!