Re: [PATCH 0/6] mm: preparatory patches for PMD level swap entries

[SJ Park]

On Sat, 4 Jul 2026 13:04:02 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi SJ,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 12:45:01PM -0700, SJ Park wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:08:03 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > CI grabs patches from patchwork and tries to apply them to one of the three
> > > bases: mm-unstable, mm-new or the latest Linus' commit merged into mm.git.
> > > 
> > > If patches apply, the other bases are not checked. 
> > > 
> > > This patches applied cleanly to mm-unstable and successfully passed (at
> > > least once :) )
> > > https://github.com/linux-mm/linux-mm/actions/runs/28544575927/
> > 
> > Awesome!
> > 
> > I found the CI script (mm-ci) on the GitHub organization.  Is the repo open to
> > contributions?
> 
> Yes :)
> 
> > If so, between GitHub PR and patches to linux-mm@ what is more
> > preferred?
> 
> The way it works, all testing update should go to mm-ci. There is a bot
> that takes them from there and generates PRs inn linux-mm that include
> patches and the CI files.

Thank you for sharing the detail!

> 
> > Seems it is not running DAMON specific tests, and I want to add
> > DAMON kunit test to the test set as a first step (DAMO selftest is bit flaky on
> > some systems), if people don't mind.
> 
> Patches are welcome :)
> 
> If DAMON selftest is flaky let's keep it out for now please, otherwise it
> would cause too much noise.

Yes, surely agreed.  There is nothing to rush :)

>  
> > I or someone else may also want to add more tests like Cc list checking [1] in
> > future.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20260703190421.100480-1-sj@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Yeah, I think it would be helpful. 

Cool, I'll try to take time to understand it more, and make some contributions.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]