RE: [PATCH rtw-next v3] wifi: rtw89: check return values in rtw89_ops_start_ap()

[Ping-Ke Shih]

d.morgun@xxxxxxxxx <d.morgun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ping-Ke,
> 
> Sorry for the confusion. The v3 suffix was added by mistake during local
> iterations of the patch.
> 
> There is no public v1/v2 in the mailing list history. This is the first
> version submitted upstream.
> 
> I will resend as v1 if needed.

No need to resend. I have merged this patch. 

Thanks
Ping-Ke