Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PM: runtime: Only set runtime_error on suspend callback failures

[Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)]

On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 3:21 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 01:49:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 10:53 AM Praveen Talari
>
> > >         /*
> > >          * On transient errors, if the callback routine failed an autosuspend,
> > >          * and if the last_busy time has been updated so that there is a new
> > >
> > > --
>
> > This is fine with me and I think that it's a quite significant change
> > for runtime PM, so I'd prefer it to go in through my tree.
>
> > I can take the other patch too if it gets ACKed for me.
>
> I've got a bunch of other stuff in flight for that driver - I'll need to
> check but just in case perhaps a tag I could pull in?

I'm wondering though if the patches in the series really depend on each other.

There doesn't appear to be any code dependency between them.