Re: [PATCH v7 5/5] iio: osf: add UART IIO driver

[Joshua Crofts]

On Tue,  7 Jul 2026 10:45:25 +0900
Jinseob Kim <kimjinseob88@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Add the Open Sensor Fusion serdev transport, driver core, and IIO
> registration path as one complete driver patch.
> 
> The driver enables the required vcc regulator, receives OSF frames over
> UART, registers IIO devices from capability reports, supports direct raw
> reads from the latest sample cache, and pushes buffered samples into
> software kfifo buffers.
> 
> Use final Kconfig and Makefile contents from the start, claim IIO buffer
> mode while pushing samples, and use zeroed scan storage with explicit
> timestamp alignment so the driver does not depend on IIO core
> bounce-buffer padding behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jinseob Kim <kimjinseob88@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                               |   5 +
>  drivers/iio/Kconfig                       |   1 +
>  drivers/iio/Makefile                      |   1 +
>  drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/Kconfig      |  15 +
>  drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/Makefile     |   6 +
>  drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_core.c   | 320 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_core.h   |  70 +++++
>  drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_iio.c    | 308 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_iio.h    |  22 ++
>  drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_serdev.c | 114 ++++++++
>  10 files changed, 862 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/Kconfig
>  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_core.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_core.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_iio.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_iio.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_serdev.c
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 3d4199d9e..6ce18ad92 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -20016,7 +20016,12 @@ M:	Jinseob Kim <kimjinseob88@xxxxxxxxx>
>  S:	Maintained
>  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/opensensorfusion,osf.yaml
>  F:	Documentation/iio/open-sensor-fusion.rst
> +F:	drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/Kconfig
> +F:	drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/Makefile
> +F:	drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_core.*
> +F:	drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_iio.*
>  F:	drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_protocol.*
> +F:	drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_serdev.c
>  F:	drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/osf_stream.*

Looking at the list of F: entries, wouldn't it be better to just
do `F:	drivers/iio/opensensorfusion/`?

-- 
Kind regards

CJD