Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: leds: lacie,ns2-leds: Convert to DT schema

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 28/07/2026 10:37, Ninad Naik wrote:
> 
> On 28/07/26 1:24 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 09:53:32PM +0530, Ninad Naik wrote:
>>> Convert lacie,ns2-leds to DT schema.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202607231542.6ovJrInT-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
>> Drop both. You need to read that report again.
> Sorry, I missed the line which says not to include the tags in a new 
> version of the same patch. Will remove.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ninad Naik <ninadnaik07@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - Add optional property num-modes to the schema.
>> Missing rest of the changelog.
>>
>> What happened here?
>>
>> Rest looks good, so with dropping incorrect tags (really, please read
>> the email you received):
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Should I carry over this tag in v4?

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here ('b4 trailers -u ...'). However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

Full context and explanation:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L591


Best regards,
Krzysztof