Re: [PATCH 2/3] power: sequencing: Add Renesas RZ/G3L Power Ready driver

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:38:00 +0200, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Hi Bartosz Golaszewski,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: 28 July 2026 15:22
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] power: sequencing: Add Renesas RZ/G3L Power Ready driver
>>
>> On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:55:22 +0200, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>> > Hi Bartosz Golaszewski,
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Sent: 28 July 2026 12:35
>> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] power: sequencing: Add Renesas RZ/G3L Power
>> >> Ready driver
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 11:17:58 +0200, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>> >> > Hi Bartosz Golaszewski,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for the feedback.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ...
>> >>
>> >> >> > +
>> >> >> > +static int pwrseq_rzg3l_pwrrdy_match(struct pwrseq_device *pwrseq,
>> >> >> > +				     struct device *dev)
>> >> >> > +{
>> >> >> > +	return PWRSEQ_MATCH_OK;
>> >> >>
>> >> >> When I see an always-tru match() callback, it always raises an alarm bell.
>> >> >> Typically, I'd expect there to be some validation of the consumer happening.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please at least provide an explanation of why it's ok.
>> >> >
>> >> > Without the match function the driver is not probing.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Yes, that's expected.
>> >>
>> >> > sysc(driver) ->powerseq(driver) ->{DSI,CSI,USB}(driver) there is no
>> >> > property that I can match here as the resource is a register on the
>> >> > SYSC IP and powerseq driver is instantiated by the SYSC driver.
>> >> >
>> >> > Maybe I can provide a comment here saying that??
>> >> > "No DT property to match here, so it is OK always"
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> So the sysc is the parent of the pwrseq provider and the CSI, DSI and
>> >> USB drivers are the consumers of the pwrseq descriptor? The latter
>> >> are children of the platform bus, am I getting this right? Can you point me to the device tree that
>> describes it?
>> >
>> > Yes,
>> >
>> > Please see [1], [2], [3]
>> >
>> > [1] sysc node
>> >
>> > [2] phyrst node (I planned to remove renesas,sysc-pwrrdy in the next
>> > version as it is going to use pwrseq)
>> >
>> > [3] dsi node (I planned to remove renesas,sysc-pwrrdy in the next
>> > version as it is going to use pwrseq)
>> >
>> > [1]
>> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tr
>> > ee/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a08g046.dtsi?h=next-20260727#n609
>> >
>> > [2]
>> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/TY3PR01MB11346FA21EFADC8A3D53D81BE86CF2@TY
>> > 3PR01MB11346.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com/T/#mf24ae1363925a97c840b275c108
>> > a9b72942c40bc
>> >
>> > [3]
>> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260704093433.273672-1-biju.das.jz@xxxxxx
>> > esas.com/T/#m31c6711b5403c5a387b22467bb88371df73ae2b1
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Biju
>> >
>>

Please wrap your emails at 80 characters as per the mailing list etiquette.

>> Then it seems you have a phandle from the DSI node to the sysc node:
>>
>> renesas,sysc-pwrrdy = <&sysc 0xd70 0x2>;
>
> But this is no more required after modelling the pwrrdy signal as powerseq driver.
>

So can you show me what the actual DT nodes and connections look like?

>>
>> In match() you can check if that phandle leads to the sysc device who's the parent of the power sequencer
>> device and return MATCH_OK if it is.
>
> As per the DT maintainer Krzysztof Kozlowski, we should not use random phandles for pwrrdy signal.
>
> Also, I confirm that this property is unnecessary if we model it as Power sequencer.
>
> From ABI, point now only matters is the pwrseq_target_data.name in the power sequence driver and
> consumers.
>
> dsi->pwrseq = devm_pwrseq_get(dsi->dev, "dsi-pwrrdy");
> priv->pwrseq = devm_pwrseq_get(dev, "usb-pwrrdy");
>
> From the experience, I don't think, DT maintainers will allow
> to define a vendor property just for the driver match.
>

You pointed me to the node so I assumed this is what it will look like. I don't
have the full context in my head.

I still prefer there to be some connection and validation of the pwrseq
consumer so I'm inquiring about the architecture.

Please respond with the relevant DT nodes' final form.

Bart