Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Clk improvements

[Daniel Almeida]

Hi Maurice,

> On 31 Jul 2026, at 15:37, Maurice Hieronymus <mhi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> at your suggestion [0] I rebased my `clk_rate_exclusive_get()` binding for
> pwm-th1520 on top of this series, so it is now waiting on it to land. As v5
> has not seen any comments in the last few weeks, I wanted to ask what the
> current status is.

Nobody has replied so far. I don’t think there are any further comments.

> 
> If there are no blockers left and you expect it to be merged soon, I am
> happy to keep waiting. Otherwise I would offer to send my series standalone
> against the current `Clk` API and let you rebase on top of mine - it is the
> much smaller of the two, touching only `Clk::rate_exclusive_get()` and
> pwm_th1520.rs.
> 
> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/140FE1B3-73CA-45EA-B978-648A1A48B577@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> 
> Maurice

Your series might hit the same blocker as this one. Perhaps we can try to get
both merged at the same time?

@Stephen gentle ping here :)

— Daniel