Re: [PATCH] fsverity: Fix bpf_get_fsverity_digest() dynptr assumptions
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Date: Sat Aug 01 2026 - 13:39:21 EST
On Sat Aug 1, 2026 at 7:15 PM CEST, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2026 at 06:52:45PM +0200, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
>> > Also correctly handle sizes over INT_MAX, which previously caused an
>> > integer overflow and crash. __bpf_dynptr_size() returns a u64.
>> >
>>
>> I guess this occurs when using file dynptrs? Otherwise the size is capped to
>> DYNPTR_SIZE_MASK.
>
> Yes, though it looks like __bpf_dynptr_data_rw() excludes file dynptrs.
> So this particular issue might be unreachable. Still seems like a good
> idea to match the u64 type that __bpf_dynptr_size() returns though.
>
I don't see this in patchwork, so you might have to resend this with [PATCH
bpf-next] subject again to trigger CI if you want this to go through bpf tree.
> - Eric