Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: ti-ads112c04: Add support for TI ADS112C04
From: Kyle Hsieh
Date: Mon Aug 03 2026 - 03:00:47 EST
Hi Joshua,
Thanks for the quick and thorough review!
On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 5:27 PM Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:58:25 +0800
> Kyle Hsieh <kylehsieh1995@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads112c04.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads112c04.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..28d3be81934f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads112c04.c
>
> Hi Kyle, quick review from me, comments inline. Additionally, please
> check Sashiko's review as there are some move severe issues (mostly
> I2C stuff), see it here:
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260731-ti-ads112c04-driver-v2-0-aab0168c3c01%40gmail.com
>
> > @@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2ㄏ.0-only
> > +/*
> > + * Texas Instruments ADS112C04 16-bit I2C ADC driver
> > + * Based on TI Reference Code and standard Linux IIO framework.
>
> Usually we'd add a Copyright (c) 2026 your_name_here your_email_here
> and maybe a datasheet link for easy lookup.
I will add both the copyright line and the datasheet link to the file header.
>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>
> Please sort your headers alphabetically.
>
> > +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
>
> Group <linux/iio/*> headers separately and add them after the generic
> <linux/*> headers.
>
> > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > +#include <linux/property.h>
> > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>
> Additionally, you're missing jiffies.h, err.h, bitops.h, types.h
All headers are now sorted alphabetically, correctly grouped, and the
missing ones have been included.
>
> > +/* ADS112C04 Commands */
>
> Unnecessary comment IMO, it's clear that these are commands from the
> *_CMD_* part (same goes for your registers comment).
Removed the redundant block comments for commands, registers, and masks.
>
> > +#define ADS112C04_CMD_RESET 0x06
> > +#define ADS112C04_CMD_START_SYNC 0x08
> > +#define ADS112C04_CMD_POWERDOWN 0x02
> > +#define ADS112C04_CMD_RDATA 0x10
> > +#define ADS112C04_CMD_RREG(reg) (0x20 | ((reg) << 2))
> > +#define ADS112C04_CMD_WREG(reg) (0x40 | ((reg) << 2))
> > +
> > +/* Registers */
> > +#define ADS112C04_REG_CONFIG0 0x00
> > +#define ADS112C04_REG_CONFIG1 0x01
> > +#define ADS112C04_REG_CONFIG2 0x02
> > +#define ADS112C04_REG_CONFIG3 0x03
> > +
> > +#define ADS112C04_DRDY_MASK BIT(7)
> > +#define ADS112C04_MUX_MASK GENMASK(7, 4)
> > +
> > +struct ads112c04_state {
> > + struct i2c_client *client;
> > + /* Protects concurrent ADC reads and device configuration */
> > + struct mutex lock;
> > + struct completion completion;
> > + struct regulator *vref_reg;
> > + int vref_mv;
>
> vref_mV, this is a good exception to the no camelCase rule, as it's a SI
> unit.
Renamed vref_mv to vref_mV.
>
> > + u8 config0;
> > + u8 config1;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int ads112c04_write_cmd(struct i2c_client *client, u8 cmd)
> > +{
> > + int ret = i2c_master_send(client, &cmd, 1);
> > +
> > + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ads112c04_read_reg(struct i2c_client *client, u8 reg, u8 *val)
> > +{
> > + u8 cmd = ADS112C04_CMD_RREG(reg);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = i2c_master_send(client, &cmd, 1);
>
> i2c_master_send returns either the amount of bytes sent or an error
> code. If the device NACKs, the function will return 0 (zero bytes sent)
> but this will be interpreted as success.
>
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = i2c_master_recv(client, val, 1);
> > + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ads112c04_write_reg(struct i2c_client *client, u8 reg, u8 val)
> > +{
> > + u8 buf[2] = { ADS112C04_CMD_WREG(reg), val };
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = i2c_master_send(client, buf, 2);
>
> Use sizeof, don't hardcode the buffer sizes.
>
> > + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ads112c04_wait_for_data(struct ads112c04_state *st)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + u8 val;
> > +
> > + if (st->client->irq > 0) {
> > + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&st->completion, msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> > + if (!ret)
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return read_poll_timeout(ads112c04_read_reg, ret,
> > + (ret < 0 || (val & ADS112C04_DRDY_MASK)),
> > + 1000, 1000000, false,
>
> Sashiko points out that read_poll_timeout discards any I2C read errors and returns
> 0. Remove the ret < 0 condition.
I will explicitly check the I2C return value right after the
read_poll_timeout macro finishes.
>
> > + st->client, ADS112C04_REG_CONFIG2, &val);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ads112c04_read_data(struct ads112c04_state *st, int *val)
> > +{
> > + u8 cmd = ADS112C04_CMD_RDATA;
> > + __be16 buf;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = i2c_master_send(st->client, &cmd, 1);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = i2c_master_recv(st->client, (u8 *)&buf, 2);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + *val = sign_extend32(be16_to_cpu(buf), 15);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ads112c04_get_adc_result(struct ads112c04_state *st,
> > + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> > + int *val)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + u8 mux, new_config0;
>
> Reverse xmas tree order please.
> > +
> > + mux = FIELD_PREP(ADS112C04_MUX_MASK, chan->address);
> > + new_config0 = (st->config0 & 0x0F) | mux;
> > +
> > + if (st->config0 != new_config0) {
> > + ret = ads112c04_write_reg(st->client, ADS112C04_REG_CONFIG0, new_config0);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + st->config0 = new_config0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + reinit_completion(&st->completion);
> > +
> > + ret = ads112c04_write_cmd(st->client, ADS112C04_CMD_START_SYNC);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = ads112c04_wait_for_data(st);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return ads112c04_read_data(st, val);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ads112c04_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> > + int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> > +{
> > + struct ads112c04_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + switch (mask) {
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> > + ret = ads112c04_get_adc_result(st, chan, val);
> > + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> > +
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > +
> > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> > + *val = st->vref_mv;
> > + *val2 = 15;
> > + return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2;
> > +
> > + default:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t ads112c04_irq_handler(int irq, void *private)
> > +{
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = private;
> > + struct ads112c04_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +
> > + complete(&st->completion);
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct iio_info ads112c04_info = {
> > + .read_raw = ads112c04_read_raw,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void ads112c04_regulator_disable(void *data)
> > +{
> > + regulator_disable(data);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ads112c04_parse_channels(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = indio_dev->dev.parent;
> > + struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> > + u32 num_channels, i = 0, pair[2];
> > +
> > + num_channels = device_get_named_child_node_count(dev, "channel");
> > + if (!num_channels)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + channels = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_channels, sizeof(*channels), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!channels)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + device_for_each_named_child_node_scoped(dev, child, "channel") {
> > + struct iio_chan_spec *spec = &channels[i];
> > +
> > + spec->type = IIO_VOLTAGE;
> > + spec->indexed = 1;
> > + spec->info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE);
> > + spec->scan_index = i;
> > +
> > + if (fwnode_property_present(child, "single-channel")) {
> > + fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "single-channel", &pair[0]);
>
> The return value of fwnode_property_read_u32 isn't checked, meaning that
> pair[0] will contain stack garbage.
>
> > + spec->channel = pair[0];
> > + spec->differential = 0;
> > + spec->address = 0x08 + pair[0];
> > + } else if (fwnode_property_present(child, "diff-channels")) {
> > + fwnode_property_read_u32_array(child, "diff-channels", pair, 2);
> > + spec->channel = pair[0];
> > + spec->channel2 = pair[1];
> > + spec->differential = 1;
> > +
> > + if (pair[0] == 0 && pair[1] == 1)
> > + spec->address = 0x00;
> > + else if (pair[0] == 0 && pair[1] == 2)
> > + spec->address = 0x01;
> > + else if (pair[0] == 0 && pair[1] == 3)
> > + spec->address = 0x02;
> > + else if (pair[0] == 1 && pair[1] == 0)
> > + spec->address = 0x03;
> > + else if (pair[0] == 1 && pair[1] == 2)
> > + spec->address = 0x04;
> > + else if (pair[0] == 1 && pair[1] == 3)
> > + spec->address = 0x05;
> > + else if (pair[0] == 2 && pair[1] == 3)
> > + spec->address = 0x06;
> > + else if (pair[0] == 3 && pair[1] == 2)
> > + spec->address = 0x07;
> > + else
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + } else {
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + i++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + indio_dev->channels = channels;
> > + indio_dev->num_channels = num_channels;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ads112c04_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > +{
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > + struct ads112c04_state *st;
> > + struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
>
> Reverse xmas tree order here as well.
I will fix the variable declaration ordering across the functions
>
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*st));
> > + if (!indio_dev)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + st->client = client;
> > +
> > + ret = devm_mutex_init(&client->dev, &st->lock);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + init_completion(&st->completion);
> > +
> > + indio_dev->name = "ads112c04";
> > + indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> > + indio_dev->info = &ads112c04_info;
> > +
> > + ret = ads112c04_parse_channels(indio_dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = devm_regulator_get_enable(&client->dev, "avdd");
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret, "failed to get avdd regulator\n");
> > +
> > + ret = devm_regulator_get_enable(&client->dev, "dvdd");
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret, "failed to get dvdd regulator\n");
> > +
> > + st->vref_reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "refp");
> > + if (IS_ERR(st->vref_reg)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(st->vref_reg);
> > + if (ret == -ENODEV) {
> > + st->vref_mv = 2048;
> > + st->config1 = 0x00;
> > + } else {
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + ret = regulator_enable(st->vref_reg);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&client->dev, ads112c04_regulator_disable,
> > + st->vref_reg);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->vref_reg);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + st->vref_mv = ret / 1000;
> > + st->config1 = 0x02;
> > + }
> > +
> > + reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> > + if (IS_ERR(reset_gpio))
> > + return PTR_ERR(reset_gpio);
> > +
> > + if (reset_gpio) {
> > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(reset_gpio, 1);
> > + fsleep(1000);
> > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(reset_gpio, 0);
> > + } else {
> > + ret = ads112c04_write_cmd(client, ADS112C04_CMD_RESET);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + fsleep(1000);
>
> Why 1000? Add a comment that links to the datasheet or an explanation.
I've reduced this timeout to 100ms and added a comment explaining that it
corresponds to the chip's slowest data rate of 20 SPS.
>
> > +
> > + st->config0 = 0x01;
> > + ret = ads112c04_write_reg(client, ADS112C04_REG_CONFIG0, st->config0);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = ads112c04_write_reg(client, ADS112C04_REG_CONFIG1, st->config1);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + if (client->irq > 0) {
> > + ret = devm_request_irq(&client->dev, client->irq,
> > + ads112c04_irq_handler,
> > + 0,
> > + indio_dev->name, indio_dev);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to request DRDY IRQ\n");
> > + return ret;
>
> Just return ret, devm_request_irq() already prints an error message on
> failure.
I will drop the redundant dev_err print.
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Joshua Crofts
Thanks again for helping polish this driver!
Best regards,
Kyle Hsieh