[tip: locking/core] locking/percpu-rwsem: Annotate intentional data race in readers_active_check()

From: tip-bot2 for Sun Shaojie

Date: Mon Aug 03 2026 - 04:11:46 EST


The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID: c9c8578ad58e66a64ca887731e2b6ebf9d71174b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c9c8578ad58e66a64ca887731e2b6ebf9d71174b
Author: Sun Shaojie <sunshaojie@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 18:41:32 +08:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:32:25 +02:00

locking/percpu-rwsem: Annotate intentional data race in readers_active_check()

KCSAN reports a data race between readers_active_check() and a
concurrently executing reader:

BUG: KCSAN: data-race in readers_active_check / percpu_down_write

race at unknown origin, with read to 0xffff9f3eb5bf5f30 of 4 bytes
by task 1271 on cpu 14:
readers_active_check+0x...
percpu_down_write+0x152/0x1f0

value changed: 0xfffffff9 -> 0xfffffff8

readers_active_check() calls per_cpu_sum(*sem->read_count), which
iterates over all CPUs and reads each CPU's per-CPU read_count
variable. Concurrently, a reader on a remote CPU is modifying its own
CPU's read_count via this_cpu_inc() / this_cpu_dec() as it enters and
exits the critical section. These are plain reads and writes to the
same per-CPU storage, hence KCSAN flags a data race.

This race is benign. readers_active_check() is called from the
percpu_down_write() wait loop (rcuwait_wait_event) after sem->block is
already set. At this point:

- New readers must immediately back out (they see block set, decrement
their counter, and wake the writer), so counters can only decrease.

- If the sum catches a reader's increment before its decrement,
readers_active_check() sees a non-zero sum and returns false. The
writer merely iterates the wait loop again -- a harmless retry.

- A false zero (observing sum == 0 while a reader is still active)
cannot happen: per_cpu_sum() reads each CPU's counter, and each
per-CPU int read is atomic on all architectures, so an active
reader's counter is always seen as non-zero.

Annotate the read with data_race() to suppress the KCSAN warning and
document the intentional nature of this unlocked access.

Signed-off-by: Sun Shaojie <sunshaojie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260623104132.505117-1-sunshaojie@xxxxxxxxxx
---
kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
index f7e152c..6c78961 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_is_read_locked);
*/
static bool readers_active_check(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- if (per_cpu_sum(*sem->read_count) != 0)
+ if (data_race(per_cpu_sum(*sem->read_count)) != 0)
return false;

/*