Re: [bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: add --no-error-summary to skip end-of-run error log dump
From: Vineet Gupta
Date: Mon Aug 03 2026 - 15:52:27 EST
On 8/3/26 11:15 AM, bot+bpf-ci@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c[ ... ]
index aa06bab309665..8ee46745e2e85 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
@@ -1686,9 +1696,12 @@ static void calculate_summary_and_print_errors(struct test_env *env)Does the comment match what the code does? The comment says "the walk
* We only print error logs summary when there are failed tests and
* verbose mode is not enabled. Otherwise, results may be inconsistent.
*
+ * --no-error-summary only elides the human readable dump: the walk
+ * still happens so the JSON report keeps its per-test results.
*/
- if (!verbose() && fail_cnt) {
- printf("\nAll error logs:\n");
+ if (!verbose() && fail_cnt && (env->error_summary || w)) {
+ if (env->error_summary)
+ printf("\nAll error logs:\n");
still happens", but the guard now requires either env->error_summary or w
to be non-NULL.
When --no-error-summary is passed without --json-summary, both
env->error_summary and w are false/NULL, so the entire for loop at the
bottom of this function gets skipped, not just the human readable output.
The walk does happen with --no-error-summary --json-summary FILE (where
w != NULL), but not in the no-JSON case. Could the comment be more
specific, maybe "the walk still happens when a JSON report was requested,
so the JSON report keeps its per-test results"?
Good catch indeed the comment overstate it. Will reword in v2.
Thx,
-Vineet
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/30836252778