Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sysctl tree with the mm-nonmm-unstable tree
From: Joel Granados
Date: Tue Aug 04 2026 - 04:17:09 EST
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 06:39:51PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the sysctl tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/time/jiffies.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 842912dea6d51 ("sysctl: remove CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL, it just mirrors CONFIG_SYSCTL")
>
> from the mm-nonmm-unstable tree and commit:
>
> a3c70a5a9f944 ("sysctl: Generate do_proc_doulongvec_minmax with do_proc_dotypevec macro")
>
> from the sysctl tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
I just checked next-20260803 and I see that all the sysctl changes are
maintained. So from my side all is well.
Best
--
Joel Granados
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature