Re: [PATCH v3] sched/fair: Prefer fully idle cores for NOHZ balancing

From: Vincent Guittot

Date: Tue Aug 04 2026 - 05:00:08 EST


On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 at 21:20, Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> find_new_ilb() selects the first idle housekeeping CPU without
> considering whether another thread is running on the same physical core.
> On an SMT system, the idle load balancer can therefore activate both
> siblings even when another housekeeping CPU has an entirely idle core.
>
> On most SMT systems, this is not problematic because the idle load
> balancer is a short-lived activity and the transient wakeup of a sibling
> has negligible performance impact.
>
> However, this can be particularly costly on NVIDIA Olympus cores used in
> Vera. Briefly activating an otherwise idle sibling can reduce the
> performance available to the other sibling and this effect does not
> necessarily end once the activated sibling becomes idle: after the ILB
> finishes and its CPU enters WFI, full single-thread performance is
> restored only after the sibling has remained idle for a qualification
> interval (10 Ki cycles on the tested Vera system). Repeated short
> sibling wakeups can therefore sustain the interference even with little
> actual overlap.
>
> Prevent this by preferring an idle housekeeping CPU whose entire SMT
> core is idle. Retain the first idle CPU as a fallback when no fully idle
> core is available, so NOHZ balancing continues to make forward progress.
> Once a partially busy core has been examined, skip its remaining SMT
> siblings to avoid repeating the core-idle check on wide SMT systems.
>
> Tests performed using an ad hoc GEMM benchmark running one CPU-intensive
> task per SMT core within its CPU affinity mask improved from
> approximately 6.2 TFLOP/s to 9.4 TFLOP/s.
>
> Note that this preference may wake a fully idle physical core instead of
> using an idle sibling of an active core, potentially increasing ILB
> wakeup latency or energy consumption on some architectures. It may also
> scan additional CPUs before selecting the one to run the ILB. The
> selection falls back to the first idle CPU when no fully idle SMT core
> is available. Non-SMT systems continue to select the first idle
> housekeeping CPU.
>
> Cc: Mete Durlu <meted@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - After finding an idle fallback, skip all siblings when a busy CPU is
> encountered, avoiding per-CPU traversal of known-busy cores (Mete Durlu)
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260729163225.1987068-1-arighi@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Avoid repeated is_core_idle() checks on wide SMT systems by pruning
> the remaining siblings of a partially busy core (Prateek Nayak)
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260728214442.1648483-1-arighi@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 37001c63452e5..574b6b3ee922a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -13965,28 +13965,66 @@ static inline int on_null_domain(struct rq *rq)
> static inline int find_new_ilb(void)
> {
> int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> - const struct cpumask *hk_mask;
> - int ilb_cpu;
> + struct cpumask *ilb_cpus;
> + int ilb_cpu, fallback = -1;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>
> - hk_mask = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE);
> + /*
> + * Reuse the per-CPU select_rq_mask, which is protected from concurrent
> + * use on this CPU by having interrupts disabled.
> + */
> + ilb_cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_rq_mask);
> + cpumask_and(ilb_cpus, nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
> + housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE));
>
> - for_each_cpu_and(ilb_cpu, nohz.idle_cpus_mask, hk_mask) {
> + for_each_cpu(ilb_cpu, ilb_cpus) {
> if (ilb_cpu == this_cpu)

this_cpu is not idle so you can apply the same as below

Other than that looks good to me

> continue;
>
> - if (idle_cpu(ilb_cpu))
> - return ilb_cpu;
> + if (!idle_cpu(ilb_cpu)) {

+ if (ilb_cpu == this_cpu || !idle_cpu(ilb_cpu)) {

> + /*
> + * Once an idle fallback exists, a busy CPU proves that
> + * this core cannot be fully idle. Skip its siblings.
> + */
> + if (sched_smt_active() && fallback >= 0)
> + cpumask_andnot(ilb_cpus, ilb_cpus,
> + cpu_smt_mask(ilb_cpu));
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Running the idle load balancer on an idle sibling of a busy
> + * SMT core can reduce the capacity available to its sibling. Prefer
> + * a CPU whose entire core is idle, but retain the first idle CPU as
> + * a fallback so idle balancing can still make progress when no fully
> + * idle core exists.
> + */
> + if (sched_smt_active() && !is_core_idle(ilb_cpu)) {
> + if (fallback < 0)
> + fallback = ilb_cpu;
> +
> + /*
> + * The core is not idle, so there is no need to check
> + * any of its other SMT siblings.
> + */
> + cpumask_andnot(ilb_cpus, ilb_cpus,
> + cpu_smt_mask(ilb_cpu));
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + return ilb_cpu;
> }
>
> - return -1;
> + return fallback;
> }
>
> /*
> * Kick a CPU to do the NOHZ balancing, if it is time for it, via a cross-CPU
> * SMP function call (IPI).
> *
> - * We pick the first idle CPU in the HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE housekeeping set
> - * (if there is one).
> + * Prefer a CPU on a fully idle core in the HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE housekeeping
> + * set. Fall back to the first idle CPU when no fully idle core exists.
> */
> static void kick_ilb(unsigned int flags)
> {
> --
> 2.55.0