Re: [PATCH v3] alloc_tag: fix undetected compressed tag overflow when profiling is disabled

From: Suren Baghdasaryan

Date: Wed Aug 05 2026 - 13:48:01 EST


On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 9:55 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2026 17:06:33 +0800 Hao Ge <hao.ge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > In reserve_module_tags(), the tag overflow check is gated on
> > mem_alloc_profiling_enabled():
> >
> > if (mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() && !tags_addressable())
> >
> > If profiling is toggled off at runtime and a module is loaded whose
> > tags exceed the compressed-mode limit, shutdown_mem_profiling() is
> > skipped. vm_module_tags_populate() still maps memory for the tags and
> > the module loads successfully, but the total tag count now exceeds what
> > NR_UNUSED_PAGEFLAG_BITS can address.
> >
> > Once profiling is re-enabled, ref_to_idx() computes each tag's index
> > as its position in the alloc_tag array. update_page_tag_ref() masks
> > it to alloc_tag_ref_mask before storing in page->flags. Indices
> > beyond the mask are truncated and idx_to_ref() resolves them to wrong
> > tags.
> >
> > This silently corrupts /proc/allocinfo: allocated pages get attributed
> > to the wrong call sites, so the statistics it reports are wrong.
> >
> > mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() and mem_profiling_compressed are
> > independent. Once compressed mode is established at boot, it stays
> > active regardless of runtime toggles of mem_profiling.
> >
> > Remove the mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() guard. Also return an error
> > after shutdown_mem_profiling() to skip vm_module_tags_populate(), as
> > the mapped pages would never be reused - shutdown_mem_profiling() sets
> > mem_profiling_support to false, so no future module load enters the
> > codetag path.
>
> Thanks.
>
> AI review points at a cpuple of possible things, one pre-existing:
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805090633.141001-1-hao.ge@xxxxxxxxx

Yes, pre-existing issue can be handled separately, it's not directly
related to this change.

>
> "Does this unintentionally result in a denial of service for module
> loading, preventing critical drivers from loading when they otherwise
> could have just disabled profiling and gracefully continued?" sounds
> pretty obscure and I doubt if we care?

Hmm, I think Hao considered that in his previous version, but now I'm
thinking we might be able to handle this more gracefully and not fail
the module loading. When profiling is disabled
codetag_needs_module_section() returns false here:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1.5/source/kernel/module/main.c#L2822,
so if we had to disable profiling, we could return NULL instead of
ENOMEM and change the condition here:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1.5/source/kernel/module/main.c#L2825
to act as if codetag_needs_module_section() was false from the
beginning. IOW code at
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1.5/source/kernel/module/main.c#L2822
becomes:

if (codetag_needs_module_section(mod, sname, shdr->sh_size) &&
(dest = codetag_alloc_module_section(mod, sname, shdr->sh_size,
arch_mod_section_prepend(mod, i), shdr->sh_addralign)) != NULL) {
...

I think this would result in a better handling of this situation: if
we can't fit the tags anymore, we issue a warning, disable profiling
but continue loading the module. Hao, WDYT?