[PATCH 0/2] loop, nbd: drop partitions left behind by the GD_NEED_PART_SCAN removal

[Daan De Meyer via B4 Relay]

Commit 267ec4d7223a ("loop: fix partition scan race between udev and
loop_reread_partitions()") stopped disk_force_media_change() from setting
GD_NEED_PART_SCAN. The caller audit in that commit only considered the bit
as a request to rescan partitions, but it did more than that:
bdev_disk_changed() drops every entry in disk->part_tbl before it consults
disk_has_partscan(), and only the re-adding half is gated on partition
scanning being enabled. The lazy scan on the next open was therefore also
the only thing removing partitions from a device that has partitions but
no partition scanning.

Loop devices without LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN are exactly such devices, and they
are not unusual. bdev_add_partition() only rejects GENHD_FL_NO_PART disks,
so BLKPG_ADD_PARTITION works while GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN is set, and
parted, libfdisk and systemd all fall back to BLKPG when BLKRRPART fails
with -EINVAL, which is what a loop device without LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN
returns.

Commit c4f4c0fc551c ("loop: remove manually added partitions on detach")
fixed the detach path after this was reported as loop devices picking up
partition devices from a previously built image:

  https://bugs.debian.org/1141434

These two patches fix the two remaining places that relied on the same
lazy cleanup, LOOP_CHANGE_FD and NBD_CLEAR_SOCK.

Both were tested with the blktests loop and nbd groups on 7.2-rc5. New
cases covering the two paths fail without these patches and pass with
them; they will be submitted to blktests separately.

Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Daan De Meyer (2):
      loop: drop stale partitions on LOOP_CHANGE_FD
      nbd: drop stale partitions on NBD_CLEAR_SOCK

 drivers/block/loop.c | 10 ++++++----
 drivers/block/nbd.c  |  7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 248951ddc14de84de3910f9b13f51491a8cd91df
change-id: 20260806-b4-loop-nbd-stale-partitions-2d10ede71a2a

Best regards,
--  
Daan De Meyer <daan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>