Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] netconsole: use the address family instead of the ipv6 flag

From: Breno Leitao

Date: Thu Aug 06 2026 - 12:18:03 EST


On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 10:33:02PM +0100, Gustavo Luiz Duarte wrote:
> Now that we have the address family in inet_addr, use that and remove
> nt->ipv6.
>
> We no longer need netcons_local_ip_unset() to check that all bytes are
> zeroes, as that is now denoted by (family == AF_UNSPEC).
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/netconsole.c | 82 ++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> index d615a9256787..070bae7b4fd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> @@ -181,7 +181,6 @@ enum target_state {
> * local_mac (read-only)
> * @local_ip: Source IP address of the target (read-write).
> * @remote_ip: Destination IP address of the target (read-write).
> - * @ipv6: Whether the target addresses are IPv6 (read-write).
> * @local_port: Source UDP port of the target (read-write).
> * @remote_port: Destination UDP port of the target (read-write).
> * @remote_mac: Destination ethernet address of the target (read-write).
> @@ -213,7 +212,6 @@ struct netconsole_target {
> bool release;
> struct netpoll np;
> struct inet_addr local_ip, remote_ip;
> - bool ipv6;
> u16 local_port, remote_port;
> u8 remote_mac[ETH_ALEN];
> /* protected by target_list_lock; +1 gives scnprintf() room for its
> @@ -463,23 +461,6 @@ static int netcons_take_ipv4(struct netconsole_target *nt,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Test whether the caller left nt->local_ip unset, so that
> - * netcons_netpoll_setup() should auto-populate it from the egress device.
> - *
> - * nt->local_ip is a union of __be32 (IPv4) and struct in6_addr (IPv6),
> - * so an IPv6 address whose first 4 bytes are zero (e.g. ::1, ::2,
> - * IPv4-mapped ::ffff:a.b.c.d) must not be tested via the IPv4 arm —
> - * doing so would misclassify a caller-supplied address as unset and
> - * silently overwrite it with whatever address the device exposes.
> - */
> -static bool netcons_local_ip_unset(const struct netconsole_target *nt)
> -{
> - if (nt->ipv6)
> - return ipv6_addr_any(&nt->local_ip.in6);
> - return !nt->local_ip.ip;
> -}
> -
> static int netcons_netpoll_setup(struct netconsole_target *nt)
> {
> struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> @@ -525,16 +506,13 @@ static int netcons_netpoll_setup(struct netconsole_target *nt)
> rtnl_lock();
> }
>
> - if (netcons_local_ip_unset(nt)) {
> - if (!nt->ipv6) {
> - err = netcons_take_ipv4(nt, ndev);
> - if (err)
> - goto put;
> - } else {
> + if (nt->local_ip.family == AF_UNSPEC) {
> + if (nt->remote_ip.family == AF_INET6)
> err = netcons_take_ipv6(nt, ndev);
> - if (err)
> - goto put;
> - }
> + else
> + err = netcons_take_ipv4(nt, ndev);
> + if (err)
> + goto put;

nice, that is much clearer.

> ip_overwritten = true;
> }
>
> @@ -716,22 +694,22 @@ static void netconsole_print_banner(struct netconsole_target *nt)
> struct netpoll *np = &nt->np;
>
> np_info(np, "local port %d\n", nt->local_port);
> - if (nt->ipv6)
> + if (nt->local_ip.family == AF_INET6)
> np_info(np, "local IPv6 address %pI6c\n", &nt->local_ip.in6);
> else
> np_info(np, "local IPv4 address %pI4\n", &nt->local_ip.ip);

Any chance it can be UNSPEC?

> np_info(np, "interface name '%s'\n", np->dev_name);
> np_info(np, "local ethernet address '%pM'\n", np->dev_mac);
> np_info(np, "remote port %d\n", nt->remote_port);
> - if (nt->ipv6)
> + if (nt->remote_ip.family == AF_INET6)
> np_info(np, "remote IPv6 address %pI6c\n", &nt->remote_ip.in6);
> else

Same question

> @@ -755,7 +733,7 @@ static int netpoll_parse_ip_addr(const char *str, struct inet_addr *addr)
> in6_pton(str, len, (void *)&addr->in6, -1, &end) > 0 &&
> (!end || *end == 0 || *end == '\n')) {
> addr->family = AF_INET6;

Why not setting family for for IPV4? In

if (in4_pton(str, len, (void *)addr, -1, &end) > 0 &&
(!end || *end == 0 || *end == '\n'))
return 0;