Re: AI slop (was Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: let special huge VMAs bypass the THP) policy check

[Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)]

On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 12:40:16PM -0500, Gregory Price wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 01:08:15PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> > On 6 Aug 2026, at 13:05, John Hubbard wrote:
> >
> > > And furthermore, that's not even a change in policy! Because traditionally,
> > > that's how people started anyway: with small patches and patience. It's
> >
> > Patience is the key. Seeing patches refreshed within a day is killing me.
> >
>
> some kind of 2-stage filtering mechanism maybe?
>
> mm gets everything
> mm-review is curated from mm to reduce noise
>
> Maybe would have to leverage a model though to surface critical things.
>
> Just an idea.

No I don't want slop going anywhere, at all. Nothing.

If you slop the reward should be silence ideally. And certainly not anything you
slopped going to any kind of branch... :)

The slopularity is upon is Gregory. Behold the desert of the real etc.

>
> ~Gregory

--
Cheers, Lorenzo