Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Prevent divide-by-zero when computing clk rate

[Cristian Ciocaltea]

Hi Mani,

On 8/7/26 3:56 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 10:41:45PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>> Calculating 'sdm' fraction in rk_hdptx_phy_clk_calc_rate_from_pll_cfg()
>> could trigger a divide-by-zero, as it uses div_u64() with a denominator
>> read directly from hardware: the values ropll_hw.sdm_deno,
>> ropll_hw.sdc_deno, ropll_hw.sdc_n, and ropll_hw.sdc_num are populated
>> from PLL registers which, in theory, could be left by the bootloader
>> uninitialized/misconfigured.
>>
>> Provide the necessary sanitization to avoid trusting the hardware state.
>>
>> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260611-hdptx-clk-fixes-v3-0-67b1b0c00e16@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?part=1
>> Fixes: 3481fc04d969 ("phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Compute clk rate from PLL config")
>> Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <diederik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  # NanoPC-T6 LTS
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c | 11 ++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
>> index 710603afff86..44e99343f249 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c
>> @@ -2270,10 +2270,15 @@ static u64 rk_hdptx_phy_clk_calc_rate_from_pll_cfg(struct rk_hdptx_phy *hdptx)
>>  
>>  	fout = PLL_REF_CLK * ropll_hw.pms_mdiv;
>>  	if (ropll_hw.sdm_en) {
>> +		val = 16U * ropll_hw.sdm_deno *
>> +		      (ropll_hw.sdc_deno * ropll_hw.sdc_n - ropll_hw.sdc_num);
>> +		if (!val) {
>> +			dev_dbg(hdptx->dev, "Invalid ROPLL hw state: deno == 0\n");
> 
> If the hardware state is invalid, why can't this be a hard failure?

This is an internal helper called from the .recalc_rate clk_op, which tries to
compute the current rate by reading back the hardware state. 

Since .recalc_rate returns unsigned long, we cannot propagate errors to the
caller.  However, per the clk_ops documentation, the driver is expected to
return 0 if it cannot figure out the rate.

Moreover, this condition isn't really fatal, as it only means the PLL
configuration currently stored in hardware can't be translated into a rate.  The
next .set_rate should program a valid configuration and help with the recovery.

Thanks for reviewing!

Regards,
Cristian