Re: [PATCH v5] dt-bindings: pwm: st,sti-pwm: convert to DT schema

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 12:58:37PM +0000, Charan Pedumuru wrote:
> Convert STMicroelectronics STiH41x PWM/Capture controller binding
> to DT schema.
> Changes during conversion:
> - Fix compatible string from "st,pwm" to "st,sti-pwm" to match the
>   actual hardware variant naming convention used across STi bindings.
> - Drop pinctrl-names from the required list as pinctrl properties are
>   inherited and validated by the pinctrl schema.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charan Pedumuru <charan.pedumuru@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - Enforce stricter validation of the clock-names property.
> - Link to v4: https://patch.msgid.link/20260625-st-pwm-v4-1-958d7d6bdf39@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> Changes in v4:
> - Fix compatible to "st,sti-pwm" in examples.
> - Modify subject line to point to the correct YAML file.
> - Link to v3: https://patch.msgid.link/20260625-st-pwm-v3-1-ace9bff88529@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix compatible to "st,sti-pwm".
> - Drop pinctrl-names from required.
> - Modify the commit message to explain the changes made.
> - Change maintainer to "Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>".

I wonder if Lee has a comment about that. In v2 the maintainer was

	Ajit Pal Singh <ajitpal.singh@xxxxxx>

and I don't see Lee agree to be named maintainer. The only rationale I
can find was

	Also the maintainer email doesn't exist now. I will change that
	too with other maintainer.

in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/9379bfdb-9a9c-4fea-924c-6c1dc8e997c1@xxxxxxxxx/
. At some point in the past lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx didn't exist either. I
added that address to the list of recipents to test.

Otherwise looks fine.

Best regards
Uwe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature