Re: [PATCH] arch_numa: Avoid false positive fortify warning in setup_node_to_cpumask_map()

From: Andrew Morton

Date: Wed Aug 12 2026 - 01:48:11 EST


On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 22:22:42 -0700 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When building ARCH=riscv using clang with CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE and
> CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS enabled, CONFIG_NR_CPUS > 64, and the default value
> of 2 for CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT, there is a compiletime warning from the
> fortify routines.

(cc Kees)

> In file included from mm/arch_numa.c:11:
> In file included from include/linux/acpi.h:14:
> In file included from include/linux/resource_ext.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/slab.h:17:
> In file included from include/linux/gfp.h:7:
> In file included from include/linux/mmzone.h:8:
> In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:60:
> In file included from include/linux/interrupt_rc.h:17:
> In file included from include/linux/smp.h:13:
> In file included from include/linux/cpumask.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/bitmap.h:13:
> In file included from include/linux/string.h:383:
> include/linux/fortify-string.h:430:4: warning: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with 'warning' attribute: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribue-warning]
> 430 | __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);
> | ^
> include/linux/fortify-string.h:430:4: note: called by function 'fortify_memset_chk(unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long)'
> include/linux/bitmap.h:248:3: note: inlined by function 'setup_node_to_cpumask_map'
> 248 | memset(dst, 0, len);
> | ^
> include/linux/fortify-string.h:462:25: note: expanded from macro 'memset'
> 462 | #define memset(p, c, s) __fortify_memset_chk(p, c, s, \
> | ^
> include/linux/fortify-string.h:453:2: note: expanded from macro '__fortify_memset_chk'
> 453 | fortify_memset_chk(__fortify_size, p_size, p_size_field), \
> | ^
> include/linux/fortify-string.h:430:4: note: use '-gline-directives-only' (implied by '-g1') or higher for more accurate inlining chain locations
> 430 | __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);
> | ^
> 1 warning generated.
>
> In this configuration, MAX_NUMNODES is 4. clang unrolls the for loop in
> setup_node_to_cpumask_map() past this, which triggers the fortify check
> when accessing node_to_cpumask_map on the theoretical fifth loop
> iteration because it would be an out of bounds write.
>
> Make it clear to clang that nr_node_ids is bounded by MAX_NUMNODES due
> to the logic in setup_nr_node_ids() by early returning in
> setup_node_to_cpumask_map() should that condition be violated.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # all applicable
> Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/2174
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This is based on mm-unstable due to the move of arch_numa.c from mm/ to
> drivers/base/ living there. I have CC'd stable because this warning
> appears in my testing back to at least 6.1 but I see no reason why it
> should not apply to all trees. No fixes tag since this is a layered
> problem that just happens to appear under certain conditions.
>
> Another alternative would be using the __assume macro to say something
> like
>
> __assume(nr_node_ids <= MAX_NUMNODES);
>
> but that seems a little more fragile.
> ---
> mm/arch_numa.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/arch_numa.c b/mm/arch_numa.c
> index 442ea239bba7..bd7772b05bcf 100644
> --- a/mm/arch_numa.c
> +++ b/mm/arch_numa.c
> @@ -105,6 +105,18 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void)
> if (nr_node_ids == MAX_NUMNODES)
> setup_nr_node_ids();
>
> + /*
> + * This check should never be true but it makes it clear to compilers
> + * that node_to_cpumask_map is bound by nr_node_ids, avoiding false
> + * positive fortify warnings when accessing node_to_cpumask_map in the
> + * for loop below.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(nr_node_ids > MAX_NUMNODES)) {
> + pr_err("nr_node_ids (%u) is larger than MAX_NUMNODES (%d)",

Sashiko wants a \n there.

> + nr_node_ids, MAX_NUMNODES);

Lord only knows why nr_node_ids is unsigned but MAX_NUMNODES is signed.

lgtm otherwise.

> + return;
> + }
> +