Re: [GIT PULL] thermal drivers fixes for v7.3-rc1
From: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
Date: Wed Aug 12 2026 - 12:15:40 EST
On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 5:16 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 8/12/26 14:50, Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 2:43 PM Daniel Lezcano
> > <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/12/26 13:28, Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) wrote:
> >>> Hi Daniel,
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 4:48 PM Daniel Lezcano
> >>> <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Rafael,
> >>>>
> >>>> please ignore this PR because there is a missing SoB.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll fix it and meanwhile update the linux-next branch so it will fix
> >>>> the build issue.
> >>>
> >>> Well, the build issue is still there in my thermal branch though.
> >>>
> >>> I've now remerged my linux-next branch to avoid exposing the thermal
> >>> drivers merge I did previously and I'll wait for another PR from you.
> >>> Worst-case I'll skip the thermal drivers material in my first 7.3-rc1
> >>> thermal PR.
> >> There are 3 fixes on top of the PR.
> >>
> >> One is obviously to be folded with the existing series as it is my fault
> >> I forgot to add the file after fixing a conflict [1] which led to the
> >> linux-next build failure.
> >>
> >> But two were reported by lkp [2][3]. May I take the opportunity to fold
> >> them with the patches they fix and shall I keep them as is ?
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260811145427.3089426-1-daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >>
> >> [2]
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260811094935.2941313-1-daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >>
> >> [3]
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260811094747.2940616-1-daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > At this point it's better to do additional fix commits on top of the
> > previous material as it has all been exposed in my thermal branch for
> > which there are no history rewrites.
> >
> > Please send me a PR with all of the fixes on top of the current HEAD
> > of my thermal branch.
>
> Do you mean linux-pm/thermal ?
Yes, that one.