Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] rust: io: register: remove relative registers

[Alexandre Courbot]

On Thu Aug 6, 2026 at 1:35 AM JST, Gary Guo wrote:
> Relative registers can be better served by projection to subregion instead
> of ad-hoc handling in register macro. Projection composes better (e.g. it
> natively allows relative registers of relative registers without needing
> additional support).
>
> Remove relative register support, and update the documentation to
> demonstrate how projection and subregions can be used to achieve this
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  rust/kernel/io/register.rs | 474 +++++----------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 422 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/io/register.rs b/rust/kernel/io/register.rs
> index 49a61da106c7..295b06dd53a7 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/io/register.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/io/register.rs
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
>  //!
>  //! Note: most of the items in this module are public so they can be referenced by the macro, but
>  //! most are not to be used directly by users. Outside of the `register!` macro itself, the only
> -//! items you might want to import from this module are [`WithBase`] and [`Array`].
> +//! items you might want to import from this module is [`Array`].

nit: "items" should now be singular.