Re: [PATCH 15/15] ARM: dts: qcom: Add initial device tree for Kuno SoC

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 10:27:18PM +0530, Hardeep Sharma wrote:
> 
> On 8/13/2026 9:31 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 11:44:28AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 04:13:40AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 09, 2026 at 12:57:14PM +0530, Hardeep Sharma wrote:
> > > > > Add SoC-level DTSI (qcom-kuno.dtsi) and IDP board DTS
> > > > > (qcom-kuno-idp.dts) for the Qualcomm Kuno SoC.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Peripherals included in this initial set:
> > > > >    - Single Cortex-A7 CPU with PSCI idle states
> > > > >    - RPMh RSC with clock controller, power domains, and BCM voter
> > > > >    - GCC (Global Clock Controller)
> > > > >    - TLMM pin controller (110 GPIOs)
> > > > >    - Interconnect (aggre-noc, cnoc-main)
> > > > >    - GENI UART console (QUP SE3)
> > > > >    - SMEM, hardware spinlocks (TCSR mutex)
> > > > This is pretty limited without any storage. Does it NAND?
> > > It has serial connection. this is enough for a start. At least one
> > > communication interface is needed for early upstreaming.
> > Yes, but then, as I wrote, it is pretty useless without the backing
> > storage. Also, it would be nice if we new the future plan. Is it going
> > to stop at this point? Is it going to be expanded in the next few weeks?
> > Will we see a spread of conflicting patches 'arm64: qcom: kuno: add
> > support for foo' with foo in 'USB, PCI, remoteproc, NAND, etc.'.
> 
> Hi Dmitry
> 
> Thanks for review.
> 
> Kuno is 32-bit ARM (Cortex-A7), so follow-ups will be `ARM: qcom:
> kuno:`, not `arm64:`.
> 
> This series is the minimum-viable base (console + core infra),
> following the sdx55/sdx75 pattern. Storage and the other drivers will
> follow in coordinated series on top of this base.

Ok, thanks for the confirmation.


Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry