[PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Improve readability in iter test for percpu data

From: Leon Hwang

Date: Fri Aug 14 2026 - 13:33:23 EST


The original 'offsetof()' + offset is equal to the new 'offsetof()'. Use
the new 'offsetof()' instead.

Rename two variables btw:

* offsetof_num -> num_off
* percpu_data_sum -> sum

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c | 6 +++---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
index 2f0dbeb88934..c6d055b9457d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
@@ -348,8 +348,8 @@ static void test_global_percpu_data_iter(void)
return;

skel->rodata->num_cpus = num_cpus;
- skel->rodata->offsetof_num = offsetof(struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu, struct_data);
- skel->rodata->offsetof_num += sizeof(skel->percpu->struct_data) - sizeof(int);
+ skel->rodata->num_off = offsetof(struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu,
+ struct_data.nums[6]);
skel->rodata->elem_sz = roundup(sizeof(struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu), 8);
skel->percpu->struct_data.nums[6] = 0xc0de;

@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void test_global_percpu_data_iter(void)
do { } while (0);
ASSERT_EQ(len, 0, "read iter");
ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->run_iter, "run_iter");
- ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_data_sum, 0xc0de * num_cpus, "percpu_data_sum");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->sum, 0xc0de * num_cpus, "sum");

close(fd);
out:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
index 12556590b647..175c44000753 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ int verifier_snprintf(void *ctx)
}

volatile const __u32 num_cpus = 0;
-volatile const int offsetof_num;
+volatile const int num_off;
volatile const int elem_sz;
-__u32 percpu_data_sum = 0;
+__u32 sum = 0;
bool run_iter = false;

SEC("iter/bpf_map_elem")
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int dump_percpu_data(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem *ctx)
run_iter = true;

for (i = 0; i < num_cpus; i++) {
- percpu_data_sum += *(int *) (pptr + offsetof_num);
+ sum += *(int *) (pptr + num_off);
pptr += elem_sz;
}
return 0;
--
2.55.0