Re: [PATCH net v6 1/4] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: Protect skb pointer used by two different kernel instances

From: Jakub Kicinski

Date: Fri Aug 14 2026 - 13:42:19 EST


On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 05:20:48 +0000 Selvamani Rajagopal wrote:
> > > I think this is giving a warning that when net is merged to net-next,
> > > which happens most Thursdays, there is going to be a conflict. How bad
> > > is that conflict? If it is trivial, don't worry, it will get
> > > handled. If the conflict resolution is not obvious, maybe you can look
>
>
> After little investigation, looks like it is trivial issue and mainly it can't be handled by
> rearranging/changing the patches. Issue is the context differs between "net" and "net-next" branch.
> I am hoping that this can be resolved while merging.
>
> In the following example, "net" branch has INT_MASK0_ALL_INTERRUPTS. But it is changed to
> OA_TC6_INT_MASK0_ALL_INTERRUPTS in net-next branch. So, no matter how I move the code around,
> this will not apply cleanly.

Ignore that warning and wait for a human review.

The patchwork warnings are _for maintainers_.

As Andrew explained the best way to avoid this is to upstream fixes
first, but if the conflicting stuff is already in net-next we will
deal with the conflict.