Re: [PATCH] arm64: hibernate: pass HVC_SET_VECTORS args to the resume hvc

[Will Deacon]

Hi Vladimir,

On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 02:06:20PM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 8/11/26 15:37, Will Deacon wrote:
> > I think I probably need to spend some time understanding how all this is
> > supposed to work. I can't currently tell how we end up with the stub
> > vectors installed to start with nor why we can't do all this from C code.

I finally got back to this...

> Here is my understanding of how things work. Assuming nVHE mode, we
> restore the previously saved image X from the currently running kernel Y.
> I’ll use the suffixes _X and _Y for addresses belonging to the respective
> images.

Nice, thanks for the walkthrough!

> On the resume path, KVM teardown sets VBAR_EL2 to __hyp_stub_vectors_Y.
> 
> swsusp_arch_resume() then temporarily (re)sets VBAR_EL2 to trans_pgd_stub_vectors
> while transitioning to image X:
> 
> |        if (el2_reset_needed())
> |                __hyp_set_vectors(el2_vectors);
> 
> 
> Currently, swsusp_arch_suspend_exit() attempts to restore VBAR_EL2 to
> __hyp_stub_vectors_X:
> 
> 
> |       cbz     x24, 3f         /* Do we need to re-initialise EL2? */
> |       hvc     #0
> 
> where x24 is resume_hdr.__hyp_stub_vectors (in other words snapshot of
> __hyp_stub_vectors from image X)
> 
> However, that request is ignored, so VBAR_EL2 remains pointing to
> trans_pgd_stub_vectors
> 
> We re-enter the kernel X.
> 
> During KVM initialisation, we call __hyp_reset_vectors(). This is
> handled by trans_pgd_stub_vectors, but ignored since HVC_RESET_VECTORS
> is not recognised. We then call __hyp_set_vectors(), which is also
> handled by trans_pgd_stub_vectors, but this time VBAR_EL2 get set to
> __kvm_hyp_init_X.
> 
> From that point on, __kvm_hyp_init_X handles subsequent HVC calls,
> including the later call that redirects VBAR_EL2 to
> __kvm_hyp_host_vector_X during KVM setup.
> 
> The memory containing trans_pgd_stub_vectors is freed later by
> swsusp_free(). That perhaps explains why we do not see any crash.

I was trying to figure out if we end up initialising VBAR_EL2 before we
"return" from swsusp_arch_suspend() and free the reserved pages.
However, it looks like we run _cpu_resume() instead of cpu_resume() so
I still can't tell why this hasn't exploded. AFAICT, the active hyp
vectors will have been freed (and possibly poisoned) long before KVM
initialises.

Speaking off-list to Mark R, he pointed me at some old rework he had for
all of this:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/suspend/cleanup

one of the patches there is very similar (identical?) to this one, but
his series gets us to a point where we _do_ resume at cpu_resume() and,
tbh, the whole thing ends up making a lot more sense.

If somebody could dust off that two-year old (!) stack, that would be
great.

Will