Re: [PATCH] thermal: change thermal_class to a const struct
From: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
Date: Mon Aug 24 2026 - 12:14:18 EST
On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 8:17 AM Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The class_create() call has been deprecated in favor of class_register()
> as the driver core now allows for a struct class to be in read-only
> memory. Change thermal_class to be a const struct class and drop the
> class_create() call.
This has been deliberately changed the other way around not too long
ago, in commit
34f54003643e thermal/core: Allocate the thermal class dynamically
and it was then argued that it would be better to allocate the class
dynamically.
You seem to have a differing opinion.
Is there any plan to remove class_create() from the kernel? If there
isn't, I'd rather stop this back-and-forth dance and leave the code
as-is.
> Compile tested only.
That is, not tested.
> Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index 28a20d4b475c..36220113ca8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -889,7 +889,9 @@ static void thermal_unbind_cdev_from_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> kfree(pos);
> }
>
> -static struct class *thermal_class __ro_after_init;
> +static const struct class thermal_class = {
> + .name = "thermal"
> +};
>
> static inline
> void print_bind_err_msg(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> @@ -973,7 +975,7 @@ thermal_cooling_device_alloc(const char *type, const struct thermal_cooling_devi
> !ops->set_cur_state)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> - if (!thermal_class)
> + if (!class_is_registered(&thermal_class))
Any chance to reduce the overhead of this check (in all places where
it is done)?
> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
> cdev = kzalloc_obj(*cdev);
> @@ -1010,7 +1012,7 @@ int thermal_cooling_device_add(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev, void *devdat
> mutex_init(&cdev->lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cdev->thermal_instances);
> cdev->updated = false;
> - cdev->device.class = thermal_class;
> + cdev->device.class = &thermal_class;
> cdev->device.release = thermal_cdev_release;
> device_initialize(&cdev->device);
> cdev->devdata = devdata;
> @@ -1447,7 +1449,7 @@ thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips(const char *type,
> if (polling_delay && passive_delay > polling_delay)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> - if (!thermal_class)
> + if (!class_is_registered(&thermal_class))
> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
> tz = kzalloc_flex(*tz, trips, num_trips);
> @@ -1483,7 +1485,7 @@ thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips(const char *type,
> if (!tz->ops.critical)
> tz->ops.critical = thermal_zone_device_critical;
>
> - tz->device.class = thermal_class;
> + tz->device.class = &thermal_class;
> tz->device.release = thermal_zone_device_release;
> tz->devdata = devdata;
> tz->num_trips = num_trips;
> @@ -1745,7 +1747,7 @@ static void __thermal_pm_prepare(void)
>
> void thermal_pm_prepare(void)
> {
> - if (!thermal_class)
> + if (!class_is_registered(&thermal_class))
> return;
>
> __thermal_pm_prepare();
> @@ -1776,7 +1778,7 @@ void thermal_pm_complete(void)
> {
> struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
>
> - if (!thermal_class)
> + if (!class_is_registered(&thermal_class))
> return;
>
> guard(mutex)(&thermal_list_lock);
> @@ -1789,7 +1791,6 @@ void thermal_pm_complete(void)
>
> static int __init thermal_init(void)
> {
> - struct class *tc;
> int result;
>
> thermal_debug_init();
> @@ -1808,13 +1809,10 @@ static int __init thermal_init(void)
> if (result)
> goto unregister_governors;
>
> - tc = class_create("thermal");
> - if (IS_ERR(tc)) {
> - result = PTR_ERR(tc);
> + result = class_register(&thermal_class);
> + if (result)
> goto unregister_governors;
> - }
>
> - thermal_class = tc;
> return 0;
>
> unregister_governors:
> --