Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: lx2160a: fix IIC1 pinmux submask rejected by pinctrl-single

From: Josua Mayer

Date: Tue Aug 25 2026 - 03:28:26 EST


Am 24.08.26 um 23:25 schrieb Vincent Jardin via B4 Relay:
> From: Vincent Jardin <vjardin@xxxxxxx>
>
> IIC1_PMUX is a single bit field at RCWSR14 bit 10, so the mask for the
> two iic1 pinmux nodes was narrowed from 0x7 to 0x1 to avoid writing the
> two reserved bits next to it.
>
> With pinctrl-single,bit-per-mux the driver does not take the supplied
> mask as the bits to modify. It derives the field from the node's
> pinctrl-single,function-mask, which is 0x7 here, and then requires the
> supplied mask to match it exactly:
>
> bit_pos = __ffs(mask); /* 10 */
> mask_pos = ((pcs->fmask) << bit_pos); /* 0x7 << 10 = 0x1c00 */
> submask = mask & mask_pos; /* 0x400 */
> ...
> if (submask != mask_pos) {
> dev_warn(pcs->dev,
> "Invalid submask 0x%x for %pOFn at 0x%x\n",
> submask, np, offset);
> continue;
> }
>
> A one bit mask gives submask 0x400 against mask_pos 0x1c00, so both
> nodes are rejected and the pins are never muxed with this message:
>
> pinctrl-single 70010012c.pinmux: Invalid submask 0x400 for iic1-i2c-pins
> pinctrl-single 70010012c.pinmux: Invalid submask 0x400 for iic1-gpio-pins
>
> The values are not changed:
> - 0x0 selects IIC1
> - 0x1 << 10 selects GPIO_1[3:2].
>
> Fixes: 7a3cc49ad1fc ("arm64: dts: lx2160a: change i2c0 (iic1) pinmux mask to one bit")
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Jardin <vjardin@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx216x.dtsi | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx216x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx216x.dtsi
> index d4522a19405a9..d9d4500a40510 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx216x.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx216x.dtsi
> @@ -1687,12 +1687,19 @@ i2c6_i2c7_pins: iic8-iic7-i2c-pins {
> };
>
> /* RCWSR14 */
> + /*
> + * IIC1_PMUX is a single bit at RCWSR14[10], but bit-per-mux
> + * uses the mask for the field to clear before applying the
> + * value.
> + * So bits 11 and 12, which are reserved, are written as 0
> + * on every mux switch, it is harmless.
> + */
> i2c0_pins: iic1-i2c-pins {
> - pinctrl-single,bits = <0x8 0x0 (0x1 << 10)>;
> + pinctrl-single,bits = <0x8 0x0 (0x7 << 10)>;
> };
>
> gpio0_3_2_pins: iic1-gpio-pins {
> - pinctrl-single,bits = <0x8 (0x1 << 10) (0x1 << 10)>;
> + pinctrl-single,bits = <0x8 (0x1 << 10) (0x7 << 10)>;
> };
> };
>
>
Reviewed-by: Josua Mayer <josua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>