Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: khugepaged: fix swap entry value to folio_pfn()
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Date: Wed Aug 26 2026 - 03:59:50 EST
On 8/26/26 04:44, Vernon Yang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 01:54:18PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> On 8/24/26 11:29, Vernon Yang wrote:
>>> From: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> When the swap entries found exceed max_ptes_swap, the loop is left via
>>> break with folio still holding the xarray value that encodes the swap
>>> entry, not valid folio pointer.
>>>
>>> That value is passed to trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_file(), which feeds it
>>> to folio_pfn(). On FLATMEM and SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, the page_to_pfn() is
>>> plain pointer arithmetic, so the trace event merely prints bogus
>>> scan_pfn. On classic SPARSEMEM, the page_to_pfn() reads page->flags,
>>> dereferencing the tiny encoded integer and oopsing khugepaged whenever
>>> the trace event is enabled.
>>>
>>> So when folio is the swap entry value, simply set pfn to -1, just like
>>> exhausted scan naturally.
>>>
>>> And the folio_put() has maybe dropped the last reference of folio. The
>>> trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_file() is left with a dangling folio pointer.
>>> so using the folio_pfn() before dropping the reference, closing
>>> use-after-free window.
>>>
>>> Fixes: d41fd2016ed0 ("mm/khugepaged: add tracepoint to hpage_collapse_scan_file()")
>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> include/trace/events/huge_memory.h | 6 +++---
>>> mm/khugepaged.c | 5 ++++-
>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h b/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h
>>> index 5a48c5406cce..7b526528f85b 100644
>>> --- a/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h
>>> +++ b/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h
>>> @@ -178,10 +178,10 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_collapse_huge_page_swapin,
>>>
>>> TRACE_EVENT(mm_khugepaged_scan_file,
>>>
>>> - TP_PROTO(struct mm_struct *mm, struct folio *folio, struct file *file,
>>> + TP_PROTO(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pfn, struct file *file,
>>> int present, int swap, int result),
>>>
>>> - TP_ARGS(mm, folio, file, present, swap, result),
>>> + TP_ARGS(mm, pfn, file, present, swap, result),
>>>
>>> TP_STRUCT__entry(
>>> __field(struct mm_struct *, mm)
>>> @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_khugepaged_scan_file,
>>>
>>> TP_fast_assign(
>>> __entry->mm = mm;
>>> - __entry->pfn = folio ? folio_pfn(folio) : -1;
>>> + __entry->pfn = pfn;
>>> __assign_str(filename);
>>> __entry->present = present;
>>> __entry->swap = swap;
>>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> index 79effd3f3da4..00337405c0e0 100644
>>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> @@ -2689,6 +2689,7 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> int present, swap;
>>> int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>>> enum scan_result result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
>>> + unsigned long pfn;
>>>
>>> present = 0;
>>> swap = 0;
>>> @@ -2719,6 +2720,7 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> continue;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
>>> if (is_pmd_order(folio_order(folio))) {
>>> result = SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE;
>>> /*
>>> @@ -2779,7 +2781,8 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> - trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_file(mm, folio, file, present, swap, result);
>>> + trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_file(mm, (!folio || xa_is_value(folio)) ? -1 : pfn,
>>> + file, present, swap, result);
>>> return result;
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> Shouldn't we just reset PFN to -1 at the beginning of the loop (and set it
>> initially)?
>
> When the `xas_for_each()` iteration to terminate and the folio operation
> preceding is normal, but pfn will be incorrect.
The PFN is only relevant when a folio participated in the failure. Maybe the
following would be cleanest?
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 75639298efc27..371ee0b16d10c 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -2683,6 +2683,7 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_scan_file(struct
mm_struct *mm,
int present, swap;
int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
enum scan_result result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
+ unsigned long problematic_pfn = -1;
present = 0;
swap = 0;
@@ -2714,6 +2715,7 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_scan_file(struct
mm_struct *mm,
}
if (is_pmd_order(folio_order(folio))) {
+ problematic_pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
result = SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE;
/*
* PMD-sized THP implies that we can only try
@@ -2725,6 +2727,7 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_scan_file(struct
mm_struct *mm,
node = folio_nid(folio);
if (collapse_scan_abort(node, cc)) {
+ problematic_pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
result = SCAN_SCAN_ABORT;
folio_put(folio);
break;
@@ -2732,12 +2735,14 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_scan_file(struct
mm_struct *mm,
cc->node_load[node]++;
if (!folio_test_lru(folio)) {
+ problematic_pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
result = SCAN_PAGE_LRU;
folio_put(folio);
break;
}
if (folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + 1 != folio_ref_count(folio)) {
+ problematic_pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
result = SCAN_PAGE_COUNT;
folio_put(folio);
break;
@@ -2773,7 +2778,7 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_scan_file(struct
mm_struct *mm,
}
}
- trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_file(mm, folio, file, present, swap, result);
+ trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_file(mm, problematic_pfn, file, present, swap,
result);
return result;
}
--
Cheers,
David