Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,qaif-cpu: Add binding

[Harendra Gautam]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 3:31 PM Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/26/26 10:55 AM, Harendra Gautam wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 3:13 PM Srinivas Kandagatla
> > <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/26/26 10:39 AM, Harendra Gautam wrote:
> >>>>> + * CIF (Codec Interface) VA TX DAI IDs -- capture from voice activity codec.
> >>>>> + * WRDMA channels collect audio from the VA codec and write it to memory.
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> +#define QAIF_CDC_DMA_VA_TX0  246
> >>>>> +#define QAIF_CDC_DMA_VA_TX1  247
> >>>>> +#define QAIF_CDC_DMA_VA_TX2  248
> >>>>> +#define QAIF_CDC_DMA_VA_TX3  249
> >>>>> +#define QAIF_CDC_DMA_VA_TX4  250
> >>>>> +#define QAIF_CDC_DMA_VA_TX5  251
> >>>>> +#define QAIF_CDC_DMA_VA_TX6  252
> >>>>> +#define QAIF_CDC_DMA_VA_TX7  253
> >>>>> +#define QAIF_CDC_DMA_VA_TX8  254
> >>>>> +#define QAIF_CDC_DMA_VA_TX9  255
> >>>>> +
> >>>> These DAI IDs exceed the LPASS_MAX_PORT limit, which will cause sound
> >>>> card registration to fail.
> >>>>
> >>>> Check sound/soc/qcom/common.c, as the current indices (246-255) are
> >>>> beyond the supported LPASS port range.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best Regards,
> >>>> Rafi.
> >>> Thanks for pointing this out. We can either add the range check for
> >>> min/max QAIF DAI IDs in qcom/common.c or introduce a common helper in
> >>> qcom/common.h to validate the supported DAI IDs across Qualcomm
> >>> platforms.
> >>
> >> You should add these ids to
> >> include/dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h instead to avoid
> >> conflicts with common code.
> >>
> >> --srini
> > Thanks for the suggestion. qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h is specific to Q6
> > DSP/AFE virtual port IDs. Since QAIF is a direct MMIO driver with no
> > Q6 DSP involvement, would adding QAIF IDs there not be misleading?
>
> These are IDs that will be reused across both dsp and non-dsp solution.
> So it makes more sense to keep it in one single place to allow the
> hardware description (DT) unchanged across different software solutions.
>
>
> > would it be better to update the range check in common.c/common.h to
> > accommodate both LPASS and QAIF DAI ID ranges instead?
> No, that does not make sense because these numbering might conflicting
> with other ports in future.
>
> --srini
Thanks for the clarification. Will add QAIF DAI IDs in qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h.
-Harendra
>
>
> THat
> > -Harendra
> >>> -Harendra
> >>
>