Re: [syzbot] [net?] WARNING: locking bug in tcp_tsq_handler
From: Hillf Danton
Date: Wed Aug 26 2026 - 06:30:52 EST
On Wed, 26 Aug 2026 06:05:15 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 5:06 AM Hillf Danton <hdanton@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 22:26:25 +0900 Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>> >On Aug 25, 2026 / 14:45, Hillf Danton wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 14:44:35 +0900 Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>> >> > On Aug 25, 2026 / 03:50, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I think 19bdb70c77d3 should be reverted.
>> >> >
>> >> > Just reverting the commit will reintroduce the other lockdep WARN that the
>> >> > commit addressed. I hope to have another fix to avoid the WARN.
>> >> >
>> >> I do not think you know the root cause of that lockdep warn, so reverting
>> >> 19bdb70c77d3 is the right thing to do because of [11, 12].
>> >>
>> >> [11] ffa1e7ada456 ("block: Make request_queue lockdep splats show up earlier")
>> >> [12] Subject: Re: [PATCH] nbd: don't warn when reclassifying a busy socket lock
>> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260816014906.1149-1-hdanton@xxxxxxxx/
>> >
>> > I took a look in the commit [11] and the discussion [12], but couldn't follow
>> > why the commit 19bdb70c77d3 should be reverted. Could you elaborate a bit more
>> > about the reason you suggest the revert?
>> >
>> The Fixes tag in d532cddb6c60 proves Eric delivered a HBC, half baked croissant,
>> to lore. And the nvme-tcp tucked in the HBC hints Eric copied something from
>> somewhere. Finally the absence of ffa1e7ada456 in 19bdb70c77d3 proves it is
>> worse than a HBC. Clear dude? Or go to read [12] again?
>
> linux development is iterative, we do not submit a single patch fixing
> 1000 bugs at once.
>
The iterative word fails to justify you can submit any fix before understanding
the root cause.
> I decided to ignore your rants a long time ago, as many others did.
>
Your HBC forced you to quiese instead just like the ostrich burying his head
in sand.
> How many bugs did you fix last year?
More than 150 [13].
[13] Subject: Re: some works in 2025
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251112225650.9224-1-hdanton@xxxxxxxx/