Re: [PATCH v1] doc: RCU: Fix typo

From: Randy Dunlap

Date: Thu Aug 27 2026 - 12:37:26 EST




On 8/27/26 2:05 AM, Costa Shulyupin wrote:
> strategem -> stratagem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks.

> ---
> Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> index 8101fe6229d5..b10e0484ae13 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> @@ -1442,7 +1442,7 @@ periods:
> corresponding CPU's next scheduling-clock.
> #. CPUs mentioned in the ``nohz_full`` kernel boot parameter can run
> indefinitely in the kernel without scheduling-clock interrupts, which
> - defeats the above need_resched() strategem. RCU will therefore
> + defeats the above need_resched() stratagem. RCU will therefore
> invoke resched_cpu() on any ``nohz_full`` CPUs still holding out
> after 109 milliseconds.
> #. In kernels built with ``CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y``, if a given task that

--
~Randy