Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mux-controller: ti: add binding for event mux router
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Fri Aug 28 2026 - 12:28:01 EST
On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 03:36:14PM +0530, Rahul Sharma wrote:
> Add binding for the event mux router of TI's K3 based SoC AM62L.
>
> The TI K3 mux routers which route the GPIO input events or Time-Sync
> events b/w peripherals instead of routing to a CPU.
>
> Refer Section 10.2 and 10.2.1 of https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/sprujb4
>
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <r-sharma3@xxxxxx>
> ---
> .../mux/ti,am62l-event-mux-router.yaml | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/ti,am62l-event-mux-router.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/ti,am62l-event-mux-router.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/ti,am62l-event-mux-router.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a5ba7f78a156
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/ti,am62l-event-mux-router.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mux/ti,am62l-event-mux-router.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: TI Event Multiplexer on K3 SoCs
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Rahul Sharma <r-sharma3@xxxxxx>
> +
> +description:
> + The TI K3 mux routers routes the GPIO input events or Time
> + Sync events between peripherals instead of routing to a CPU.
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: mux-controller.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: ti,am62l-event-mux-router
> +
> + reg:
> + description: Register base address and size.
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + '#mux-control-cells':
> + const: 1
> + description:
> + Number of cells in a mux control specifier. This should be 1.
> + The cell specifies which mux control to use (0-based index).
> +
> + ti,reg-mask-val:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-matrix
> + items:
> + items:
> + - description: Register offset (relative to reg base)
> + - description: Bit mask for the mux control bits
> + - description: Value to write when mux is active (state 1)
> + minItems: 1
> + description: |
> + Array of triplets specifying register offset, mask, and value for each
> + mux control. Each triplet contains:
> + - register offset (relative to reg base)
> + - bit mask for the mux control bits
> + - value to write when mux is active (state 1)
You have a device-specific compatible, why do you need this? If the
active setting depends on the device or w/e, why can that not come from
a mux-control-cell?
> +
> + idle-states:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
This is not needed, you get the type from mux-controller.yaml.
pw-bot: changes-requested
Thanks,
Conor.
> + description: |
> + Idle state for each mux control. Each entry corresponds to a mux control:
> + - 0: clear masked bits when idle, also refers to inactive state
> + - 1: set configured value when idle, also refers to active state
> + - MUX_IDLE_AS_IS (-1): keep current state when idle
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - '#mux-control-cells'
> + - ti,reg-mask-val
> + - idle-states
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/mux/mux.h>
> +
> + // Example 1: TI AM62L GPIO Mux Router
> + mux-controller@a00000 {
> + compatible = "ti,am62l-event-mux-router";
> + reg = <0xa00000 0x400>;
> + #mux-control-cells = <1>;
> +
> + /* Mux Register addresses: 0xa00004 + (J × 4) */
> + /* GPIO0_40 -> BCDMA trigger 15 */
> + ti,reg-mask-val = <0x40 0x000ff 0x00028>;
> + idle-states = <0>;
> + };
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature